A Few Questions For Creationists

Theistic evolutionists should be considered creationists because they still believe that God CREATED species even though they accept that he used evolution to do it.

The word "evolution" doesn't always mean the Theory of Evolution as in Darwin's theory on the origin of species.For example, we could talk about the evolution of cars. They have changed a lot over the years. There is even selective pressure on them from the market.If you argued against that position because evolution is a process which happens to living organisms then I'd tell you that you were an idiot.

...and?Its no bid deal, really. The put quotes around the words they were "equivocating". That shows that they don't literally mean growth and that they are using it as an analogy.You're just bitching about it because you don't like evilution.And in the paragraph you quoted, when they use the word "evolution", they are not referring specifically to Darwin's Theory of Evolution. They are talking generally in how things evolve when there is some selective pressure.So, there's really no problem with the paragraph nor have you supported you position that:

quote:

---

You are right, without DNA, metabolism , sometype of cellular wall and reproduction (it's different that replication) then you cannot have evolution and natural selection.

---

There's plenty of evidence that abiogenesis is on the right track. Just beause there isn't one unifying theory doesn't mean that we're not right so far. So, in addition to not knowing the difference between spontaneous gereation and abiogenesis, you also don't know what a religion is Its a good thing that the scientists aren't using those fallacies.