Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,478 Year: 3,735/9,624 Month: 606/974 Week: 219/276 Day: 59/34 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution: a red herring?
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5930 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 10 of 120 (377328)
01-16-2007 8:54 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by limbosis
01-16-2007 4:11 AM


limbosis
No one is obliged to observe current science, especially when they recognize that many major advances in science would not have ever occured until and unless existing theories had been completely ignored.
I find this a curious statement. What existing theories were ignored?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by limbosis, posted 01-16-2007 4:11 AM limbosis has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by limbosis, posted 01-18-2007 2:03 AM sidelined has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024