Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,789 Year: 4,046/9,624 Month: 917/974 Week: 244/286 Day: 5/46 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution: a red herring?
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3670 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 94 of 120 (382857)
02-06-2007 7:09 AM
Reply to: Message 80 by EODoc
02-06-2007 4:57 AM


Re: tiktaalik
Well, I happen to have a Ph.D. in chemisty
Its only called "chemical evolution" because its the theory that non-living chemicals spontaneously arranged themselves to become the first life form. This breaks the biologist most fundamental law.
Please, please tell me the name of your supervsior... he needs to be shot for his own good!
Seriously though, how can you claim to be a scientist... and a chemist!!!!... and spout crap like this? Do you know what a LAW is? I guess that I as a relativist have spent my academic life working on nonsense as I have been breaking Newton's Law of Gravitation? Not to mention all of Newton's Laws of Motion... and in my work on quantum gravity, I guess I'm also guilty of breaking all three Thermodynamic Laws. Oh dear...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by EODoc, posted 02-06-2007 4:57 AM EODoc has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by EODoc, posted 02-06-2007 7:25 AM cavediver has replied
 Message 96 by EODoc, posted 02-06-2007 7:27 AM cavediver has not replied

cavediver
Member (Idle past 3670 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 98 of 120 (382862)
02-06-2007 7:39 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by EODoc
02-06-2007 7:25 AM


Re: tiktaalik
My apologies for appearing (and admittedly being ) so insulting... BUT, I hold scientists and postdocs to a much higher standard than a casual observer at EvC. And you are being unbelievably simplistic for someone with your credentials. A LAW is essentially an overarching principle that helps someone not intimately connected with a field get a grasp of what is going on.
Do you think I give a damn about ANY of Newton's Laws? Do you think those working on existing biological systems that seem to exist on a continuum that straddles our usual definition of life give a damn about this Biogenetic Law? We have enough trouble defining life at the moment so how the hell can we have a Biogenetic Law that means anything sensible other than something to tell school kids?
Tell me, if you believe in an absolute Biogenetic Law, perhaps you would tell me what absolute definition of life you are using?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by EODoc, posted 02-06-2007 7:25 AM EODoc has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by EODoc, posted 02-06-2007 7:59 AM cavediver has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024