Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,810 Year: 4,067/9,624 Month: 938/974 Week: 265/286 Day: 26/46 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationism in Schools
toff
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 116 (4556)
02-15-2002 7:41 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by quicksink
02-15-2002 6:55 AM


The basic problem with teaching creationism in schools isn't that it is completely religious in origin and foundation. It is, of course, but that isn't the real problem. The big problem is that it's wrong. Our schools (naturally) attempt to teach correct facts - in science, they teach correct facts, and possible interpretations of those facts, including the most popularly held. However, creationism is supported by no facts (outside the bible, which is a religious text). If it were supported by evidence sufficient to make it a genuine 'contender' as to origins, it would be taught in schools, regardless of the fact that its origin is religious in nature.
But it's not. At root, that's the biggest problem for the creationists trying to get it taught in schools. It's wrong. When it comes to facts and supporting evidence, it is not a 'contender' as a theory about our origins. It's on the same level as the myths of the Australian aborigines, or the belief that we were sneezed out by a mutant star-goat. It has no support whatsoever apart from religious beliefs. As such, it is not taught.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by quicksink, posted 02-15-2002 6:55 AM quicksink has not replied

  
toff
Inactive Member


Message 37 of 116 (4916)
02-18-2002 6:11 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by TrueCreation
02-16-2002 3:34 PM


quote:
Originally posted by TrueCreation:
"In the Us, it is illegal to teach religion scripture has scripture. If creationism was a better theory than evo, then it would be taught in schools, as it would not be only religious, but also highly credible and therefore the closest to the truth about our origins.
if this happened, which never will, we would see mass conversions to christianity."
--Who said that we had to teach creationism? Who said we had to teach faith? Who said we had to teach religion? If you know the model of Creationism, you would know that you can teach creation science (If your going to call it that) without even mentioning the bible, faith, or religion.

No offense, but that is complete nonsense. To teach creationism, one MUST teach religious beliefs as fact (ie., that there is a god, that he created the world, etc.)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by TrueCreation, posted 02-16-2002 3:34 PM TrueCreation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by nator, posted 02-18-2002 11:27 AM toff has not replied
 Message 40 by TrueCreation, posted 02-18-2002 11:45 AM toff has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024