Author
|
Topic: The very beginning
|
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1494 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: 03-20-2003
|
There is no shame in not knowing something. What's shameful is those who hoard knowledge instead of sharing it. Although generally they're just covering ignorance.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 29 by PecosGeorge, posted 01-19-2005 10:35 AM | | PecosGeorge has not replied |
|
PecosGeorge
Member (Idle past 6900 days) Posts: 863 From: Texas Joined: 04-09-2004
|
|
Message 32 of 40 (178532)
01-19-2005 11:23 AM
|
Reply to: Message 18 by crashfrog 01-18-2005 11:20 AM
|
|
Not buying it. You cannot show whence came that very first ingredient. I don't mind spontaneous combustion, but it must have fuel to combust. Give me the origin of the first ingredient.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 18 by crashfrog, posted 01-18-2005 11:20 AM | | crashfrog has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 35 by crashfrog, posted 01-19-2005 11:43 AM | | PecosGeorge has replied |
|
PecosGeorge
Member (Idle past 6900 days) Posts: 863 From: Texas Joined: 04-09-2004
|
Re: always missing the point
quote: So - What evidence do you have that the universe didn't exist at some point, or that God's existence preceded that of the universe? The interpretation of Genesis I choose to follow states that something else created God, so simply saying "the Bible says so" doesn't work here.
There is no evidence for either side. And the Christian side should not claim any, since its system is based on faith of the things one cannot see.
|
PecosGeorge
Member (Idle past 6900 days) Posts: 863 From: Texas Joined: 04-09-2004
|
|
Message 34 of 40 (178535)
01-19-2005 11:34 AM
|
Reply to: Message 30 by NosyNed 01-19-2005 10:58 AM
|
|
Re: Stupid games
Why, Ned! I believe you are angry. You still haven't told me where that first speck came from, and you should be able to do so since you base so much theory on it 'having arrived'.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 30 by NosyNed, posted 01-19-2005 10:58 AM | | NosyNed has not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 37 by Dr Jack, posted 01-19-2005 11:54 AM | | PecosGeorge has replied |
|
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1494 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: 03-20-2003
|
You cannot show whence came that very first ingredient. Your error is presuming that cause and effect trancends time; when it's obvious that it cannot.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 32 by PecosGeorge, posted 01-19-2005 11:23 AM | | PecosGeorge has replied |
|
PecosGeorge
Member (Idle past 6900 days) Posts: 863 From: Texas Joined: 04-09-2004
|
|
Message 36 of 40 (178545)
01-19-2005 11:50 AM
|
Reply to: Message 35 by crashfrog 01-19-2005 11:43 AM
|
|
show it
This message is a reply to: | | Message 35 by crashfrog, posted 01-19-2005 11:43 AM | | crashfrog has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 38 by crashfrog, posted 01-19-2005 12:20 PM | | PecosGeorge has replied |
|
Dr Jack
Member Posts: 3514 From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch Joined: 07-14-2003 Member Rating: 8.3
|
Re: Stupid games
I refer you to message #15.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 34 by PecosGeorge, posted 01-19-2005 11:34 AM | | PecosGeorge has replied |
|
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1494 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: 03-20-2003
|
show it I would have thought it obvious; but the way we determine which is the cause and which is the effect is via their sequence in time; therefore causality is a relationship which cannot exist out of time, seeing as how it's so intimately bound up in it. There's no cause and effect outside of time. If the origin of the universe is outside of time then it must be without cause.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 36 by PecosGeorge, posted 01-19-2005 11:50 AM | | PecosGeorge has replied |
|
PecosGeorge
Member (Idle past 6900 days) Posts: 863 From: Texas Joined: 04-09-2004
|
|
Message 39 of 40 (178605)
01-19-2005 2:53 PM
|
Reply to: Message 37 by Dr Jack 01-19-2005 11:54 AM
|
|
Re: Stupid games
Thank you.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 37 by Dr Jack, posted 01-19-2005 11:54 AM | | Dr Jack has not replied |
|
PecosGeorge
Member (Idle past 6900 days) Posts: 863 From: Texas Joined: 04-09-2004
|
|
Message 40 of 40 (178608)
01-19-2005 2:55 PM
|
Reply to: Message 38 by crashfrog 01-19-2005 12:20 PM
|
|
Thank you. It most certainly must be. Very kind.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 38 by crashfrog, posted 01-19-2005 12:20 PM | | crashfrog has not replied |
|