Hi JT, I don't mean to jump into your conversation with the others but I wanted to bring up an issue with your post. You start at one side of an evolutionary journey (gorilla) and end up at another side (human) and claim that the differences are too much. You have to look at the claimed transitionals, at the possible evolutionary ancestors of these two sides to see if a comparison can be made.
To paraphrase the frog, it's like looking at NYC and LA and claiming that you can't get from one to the other because the distance is too great. You fail to see the many other cities, towns, villages, and roads along the way that lead you between the two.
Maybe in your discussions with the others, you could remember that it isn't the difference between a gorilla and a human...but the differences between any number of fossils that go back closer and closer to the split between the two.
http://www.scientific-art.com/...ontology%20pages/skulls.htm
No page found
No page found
http://www.ling.upenn.edu/...g_2001/ling001/boule_skulls.gif
And the ever famous (around here anyway)...
Asgara
"Embrace the pain, spank your inner moppet, whatever....but get over it"