Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,819 Year: 3,076/9,624 Month: 921/1,588 Week: 104/223 Day: 2/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   cambrian death cause
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1467 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 85 of 232 (124393)
07-14-2004 3:47 AM
Reply to: Message 84 by simple
07-14-2004 3:19 AM


OK, so "We do not find fossils of marine mammals in the layers where we find marine dinosaurs. Never. Nyet. Nada. Nowhere.
And we never find marine dinosaurs in the layers with marine mammals. Never. Nyet. Nada. Nowhere." (post 76 in fossil sorting in the great flood 2- by 'jar') must be wrong.
No, that's still a true statement. No marine mammals are found in layers with marine dinosaurs.
Mammals existed during the time of the dinosaurs, sure, but there were no marine mammals at that time.
Get it, yet? Both statements are true - there were mammals alive at the time of the dinosaurs; no marine mammals were alive during the time of the dinosaurs.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by simple, posted 07-14-2004 3:19 AM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 87 by simple, posted 07-14-2004 3:58 AM crashfrog has not replied
 Message 88 by simple, posted 07-14-2004 3:59 AM crashfrog has replied
 Message 92 by arachnophilia, posted 07-14-2004 6:06 AM crashfrog has replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1467 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 89 of 232 (124400)
07-14-2004 4:12 AM
Reply to: Message 88 by simple
07-14-2004 3:59 AM


That makes sense from an evo standpoint.
As well as from an evidentiary standpoint.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by simple, posted 07-14-2004 3:59 AM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by simple, posted 07-14-2004 4:25 AM crashfrog has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1467 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 95 of 232 (124523)
07-14-2004 4:17 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by arachnophilia
07-14-2004 6:06 AM


Yeah, I had thought that was the case... oh, well.
Is there a catch-all term for prehistoric aquatic reptiles contemporary with dinosaurs?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by arachnophilia, posted 07-14-2004 6:06 AM arachnophilia has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by 1.61803, posted 07-14-2004 4:26 PM crashfrog has not replied
 Message 98 by Chiroptera, posted 07-14-2004 4:30 PM crashfrog has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024