Frankly, I just cannot see how you can overestimate the significance of evo obstinance that even something as small as this, it took well over 100 years to get evos to back off and admit at least the data was faked.
Now the fatal flaw of evolution is "evo obstinance"? Yes it was a blotch for too long. But it is a detail that has been corrected (or at least mostly corrected, you even seem to agree).
In fact, they are now trying to resurrect Haeckel and some form recapitulation to some degree.
I want to see some solid support data for that assertion. You may post such as a response to this message.
And how about slowing down your posting rate? Maybe a few gem postings instead? Don't reply to this last part.
Adminnemooseus