|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Ignorant Creationists vs. Knowledgeable Evolutionists | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
kc8rdb Inactive Member |
That is sooo true. Studying science during gradeschool and even high school was a breeze (my school believes that the only "science" is Creationism). Studying evolution now is a challenge, not only because of the way I was taught science, but it also challenges my belief system as a Creationist.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brad McFall Member (Idle past 5032 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: |
I am interested in creationist biology because there was not any place for me to become a herpetologist and insofar as this WAS DUE to evolutionist suppresion of Aggaizz's over a hundred year old prescription on "darwinist" inference, I am an creationist strictly but I would like to see the only herpeteological aspect of Lamarkism better explained in the literature without reference to "politics". If I had gone to SUNYBighamton instead of Cornell I would likely be a specialist in salamander speciation rather than showing up the old motto of CU. I am an ordained elder in the Presbyterian Church. I also think the Russian Georgi Gladyshev is dead on-no matter how, one takes Pasteur's grand asymmetry as to D and L amino acids. We all come with "bagAge" hopefully this is only luggage.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NosyNed Member Posts: 8996 From: Canada Joined: |
...but it also challenges my belief system as a Creationist. And that is why a large number of believers are against creationism. When people are taught ignorance and have it inclucated into them that if the science stuff is true then God doesn't exist their faith can be shattered by the truth. There is no reason why you can't maintain a belief in God and Christ as evidenced by many believers here who do while still understanding what we have learned through science. The majority of believers have maintained their faith while still understanding and accepting scientific results. Good luck. ( a small note: creationist can be term meaning God created everything . That rather open meaning isn't useful in the context of the discussions here. The more restricted meaning is usually the one used -- a person who believes in a 6 day creation, young earth etc.)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gary Inactive Member |
Just out of curiosity, where did you go to high school? I went to high school in Florida, and the teacher only briefly mentioned Creationism, but when I took an introductory biology course at UF, we spent much more time discussing the problems with Creationism and evidence supporting evolution. I thought that it was illegal to teach Creationism in most places, at most, they have an "equal time" type of thing where teachers must give the same amount of class time to evolution as they do to Creationism.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
IMHO the issue is not really Creation vs Evolution, GOD vs Science. Instead it is between reliance on theories developed thousands of years ago or more recent theories, between theories based on evidence that was available thousands of years ago and those that consider what we have learned since then.
The Classic Creationist wants to take the tales in Genesis literally. We can see this in other threads where they vigorously declare that there are no differences between the accounts in Genesis 1 & 2, even when anyone who reads those chapters can see the differences themselves. The difference, IMHO, is that those who wish to take the Genesis Creation story literally start with a belief that it is true, and so any problems seen are simply our own misunderstanding. They go through amazing mental gymnastics to show those mutually exclusive statements simply are not mutually exclusive. It is a willing suspension of belief. I would describe myself as a Creationist. I believe that GOD created the Universe and all that we can experience. I believe that the thing that changed the state of the primordial egg was GOD, that GOD was what lead to the Big Bang. If one day we should discover that Brane Theories are correct and that is what lead to the Big Bang, my reaction would be, "Oh, that's how GOD did it!" For me, there is no real conflict between the Bible and Evolution, between the Bible and Science. The purpose of the Bible is to provide guidelines for living a moral life. The two are mutually supportive and not exclusionary. Classic Creationists have a problem. Their faith, which is very important to them, is tied up and based on a thing, a work, an anthology. The threat from the Theory of Evolution is percieved. It is internal to their theology. Their theology is not based on the moral message from the Bible but rather the text itself. As I have said before, it is founded on the reality of the Map and not on the actual Territory. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
kc8rdb Inactive Member |
I went to a private school in Michigan where it is legal for them to teach Creation as science.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
kc8rdb Inactive Member |
I agree with you here. I was raised in the "classic Creationist" tradition, and taught the arguments for Creation to the exclusivity of evolution. However, as I study more and more, I am finding out that this may not be the right approach. See why I am so confused? Most of what I have been taught about the origin of the earth is not what I am learning now. Make sense?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NosyNed Member Posts: 8996 From: Canada Joined: |
See why I am so confused? Most of what I have been taught about the origin of the earth is not what I am learning now. Make sense? Of course it makes sense that there is confusion. From my point of view that is something that the literalists are doing deliberately. However, how to you, personally, decide what is correct? There is an immense store of information spanning several sciences. Some of it is simple enough, but much of it is complex and requires a lot of background. If you care enough to want to know what is more likely to be correct how do you manage that? What do you learn about, from whom? How do you take that knowledge and apply it to coming to your own conclusions?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loudmouth Inactive Member |
quote: Who do you trust more on the subject of science, the creationist teachers or your current teachers?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
kc8rdb Inactive Member |
That is what I am currently trying to work out. For several weeks now I have been trying to systematically study into the theories of evolution, as well as the evidences thereof. I know that there is a wealth of information out there, so therefore a biology teacher out in Mississippi has been helping to guide my studies in this respect. He has recommended some biology textbooks, which I study when I can, and he is always there if I have any questions about anything. Also, there are several others that I talk to who are ready and willing to answer questions. From what I learn in this manner, I am able to draw my own conclusions that are based on logic and evidence. At this point in time, my search is far from over, but eventually I will arrive at a final conclusion. When that will be, I do not know.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
kc8rdb Inactive Member |
Who is to say which is really right??? Sometimes when I am studying I begin to wonder which way is up, if you know what I mean.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NosyNed Member Posts: 8996 From: Canada Joined: |
I think there are resources here that you can use too. Some of the people here actually know stuff (unlike yours truely). We have "resident" biologists, geneticists and geologists.
Many of them are generous with their time in trying to help. You might want to make use of that. Are you attempting to organize how you approch it? That is, are there specific questions that you think are core? One example that I would use is the age of the earth thing. I have stated before that I'd have a tough time accepting evolutionary theory if the earth were only 6,000 years old. Therefore I would put that one high on my list of things to sort out. The side effect is that some of the demonstrations of the reasonableness of evolutionary theory is the correlation between the dates of fossils and the relationship of genetic differences. If the fossil dating isn't acceptable to someone then they can't make sense out of the correlation can they? After that, the question that might be asked is: what is the real nature of the fossil evidence? Are there "transitionals"? What the heck do I, as in me the individual, think one would look like? Why do I think that? What do you think of that? (added by edit)Above I'm not talking about the theory of evolution by the way. After you think you have enough information to accept that the evolution of life on earth probably happened then you may consider explanations of how it happened. That is tougher actually. I think it requires a lot more work to understand what it is saying and decide if it is plausible. This message has been edited by NosyNed, 11-09-2004 05:31 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Well hang in there. Go where the evidence leads you and you'll find the journey exciting and most enjoyable.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loudmouth Inactive Member |
quote: I am speaking from my experiences with creationists, so this may not apply to your situation. In debate boards and personal conversations the thing that always stuns me is the scientific falsehoods that are spread by creationists. For instance, many creationists claim that helium does not escape the atmosphere in an attempt to show that the earth is young (if you want the full argument I can explain it in another post). However, it has been known for over 20 years that helium can and does escape the atmosphere at a rate that ensures a balance between production and atmospheric buildup. This, along with other notions that have beens shown to be wrong, make me distrust creationists. Of course, evolution has had it's knocks along the way. However, the falsehoods in evolution have been refuted BY EVOLUTIONISTS, not creationists. Again, in my experience, creationists teach falsehoods on a regular basis. For most of the scientifically uneducated creationists it isn't really telling a lie, it is unknowingly relaying false information. I am a scientist, and this type of behavior is NEVER, and I repeat NEVER, condoned nor allowed in the sciences. When false information is uncovered in the biological sciences the perpetrator is often stripped of all their research money and sent packing. In the creationist world, the perpetrator is often praised for being falsely persecuted. This type of activity on the part of creationists that I have read and interacted with leaves a very sour taste in my mouth. At this point in your life these people may be authority figures in your life, and outside of scientific discussions they may be very knowledgable and wise people. My only suggestion is to do exactly what you are doing now, take all the evidence at face value and judge it on logic and rational. In addition to this, I would also suggest that you understand the philosophy behind the the scientific method. This is the foundation for all of the sciences, and the better you understand the basis, the scientific method, the better you will comprehend all the theories in the sciences. Good luck, have a wonderful journey.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
I would describe myself as a Creationist. I believe that GOD created the Universe and all that we can experience. I believe that the thing that changed the state of the primordial egg was GOD, that GOD was what lead to the Big Bang. So by the same token, do you believe in God-selection (GS) rather than secularist natural selection (NS) and God-mutation rather than secularist random mutation?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024