Equipoise, Faith & the Purpose of Apologetics

When investigating a claim, common ethics require that one approach the claim with equipoise. To quote a rather nice definition from the January issue of Skeptical Inquirer, "Equipoise means beginning one's research, investigation, or diagnosis without bias. Equipoise is essential so that the investigation can be pursued adequately, as bias can influence data acquisition. If an investigator begins acquiring data with an aim toward finding something in particular, then one is apt to discard some data, or misinterpret data, even potentially unconsciously, in order to confirm one's hypothesis."Hello all. I'm happy to see that this board has a forum dedicated to the topic of faith. I've come to a time in my life when it feels important to me to understand the roles of faith and skepticism. In particular, I'm fascinated and puzzled by the purpose of apolgetics and would like to discuss it.My background is Christian, so when I think of apologetics, I tend to think of Christian apologetics. To be quite frank, as I began to lose my Christian faith, apologetics that once seemed brilliant to me came to seem unconvincing in the extreme. Has anyone else had this experience? Why would this be?To quote Hebrews 11:1 from the NIV, "Now faith is being sure of what we hope to find and certain of what we do not see." Can a person of faith examine an apologetic for that faith with equipoise? Is it possible to present an apologetic for a matter of faith that will seem excellent when approached with equipoise? If an apologetic does indeed stand up to harsh skeptical scrutiny, has it by very definition passed outside of the pale of faith and entered the scientific realm? Does one require faith, as it has been suggested to me, in order to approach an apologetic "aright?"Is there some middle ground or a third alternative that I'm failing to take into consideration? Edited by GlassSoul, : No reason given.

---

My looking ripens things and they come toward me, to meet and be met. ~ Rilke

HI. Thanks for the suggestions.I'd really like to keep the term "equipoise" in there. The first paragraph defines it quite nicely, I think. "Unbiased" is a fairly good synonym, but "counterbalanced" would be a better one.Instead of putting my own spin on the Hebrews passage, why don't I simply quote it from the NIV. I think doing that makes the questions that follow a little clearer. I've gone ahead and changed that.Apologetics may be addressed to unbelievers (and believers too, I would think), but not all unbelievers are skeptics. The passage in Hebrews seems to me to describe a mindset that is the antithesis of equipoise. In light of that, can an apologetic be posed for a matter of faith that will stand up to skeptical inquiry?So, I'm not really asking if a person who has faith can be neutral about his faith, but whether a neutral person can be brought to faith by means of an apologetic. Edited by GlassSoul, : No reason given.