Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Discussing the evidence that support creationism
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3598 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 218 of 301 (443451)
12-25-2007 3:53 AM
Reply to: Message 213 by Buzsaw
12-24-2007 7:24 PM


Re: Wikipedia Liberal Anti-Creationist Bias
Thanks to whoever invented this subtitle. I got a good chuckle out of it.
Buz, do I have you to thank?
Science excludes pseudoscience. This is a matter neither of bias nor 'liberalism' (whatever that is). It's in the definition. Science and pseudoscience are mutually exclusive categories.
To all creatures fundy and infidel: a Joyous Noel.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 213 by Buzsaw, posted 12-24-2007 7:24 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 220 by Buzsaw, posted 12-25-2007 9:28 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied

Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3598 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 232 of 301 (443528)
12-25-2007 3:15 PM
Reply to: Message 216 by CK
12-24-2007 10:41 PM


Where's the Beef? The Chicken? The Egg?
Evidence presented supporting creationism = 0%
CK is right. Where is the 'evidence that support [sic] creationism' we are supposed to be discussing? I've been scanning posts and don't see where anything has been presented.
This thread could have been named 'How to Mix a Martini' and the content would have as much relevance to the stated topic.
There's not much thread time left. Evidence, please.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 216 by CK, posted 12-24-2007 10:41 PM CK has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024