Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 84 (8914 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 06-18-2019 9:23 PM
31 online now:
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: 4petdinos
Post Volume:
Total: 854,097 Year: 9,133/19,786 Month: 1,555/2,119 Week: 315/576 Day: 118/98 Hour: 2/8


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Discussing the evidence that support creationism
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 807 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 179 of 301 (442812)
12-22-2007 5:54 PM
Reply to: Message 178 by Aquilegia753
12-22-2007 5:52 PM


Not DNA!
However, there could not have been proteins before DNA, or DNA before proteins.

The earliest form of "life" was NOT DNA BASED.

Do you make a habit of not reading the replies to your inanity?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 178 by Aquilegia753, posted 12-22-2007 5:52 PM Aquilegia753 has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 180 by Aquilegia753, posted 12-22-2007 6:05 PM molbiogirl has not yet responded

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 807 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 181 of 301 (442826)
12-22-2007 6:29 PM
Reply to: Message 178 by Aquilegia753
12-22-2007 5:52 PM


Look, pal, any argument you make based on proteins or DNA is moot.

RNA was the first form of "life".

Here is the post to which I am referring:

Proteins. Simple proteins allow for cells to live. There are a specific 20 that are needed for DNA to be created. However, these 20 proteins are only created at the command of the DNA they produce. Assuming evolution is real, than at some time, there were neither, and now there are both. So, to start the cycle you need DNA, but DNA needs those 20 proteins, and those proteins need DNA. So, because both needs the other, one could logically conclude that there were either both or neither at the beginning of time (the big bang or 'God made the heavens and the earth'). And because there are both now, we must assume that both were created sometime between the beginning and now. Because of their mutual dependence on one another, both had to be created at the same time. Therefore, creation is the only likely solution.

Neither proteins nor DNA are necessary for an "RNA World".

Let me repeat this, since you seem hard-of-hearing:

PROTEIN AND DNA ARE IRRELELVANT.

Capiche?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 178 by Aquilegia753, posted 12-22-2007 5:52 PM Aquilegia753 has not yet responded

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 807 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 288 of 301 (444062)
12-28-2007 4:02 AM
Reply to: Message 286 by Buzsaw
12-27-2007 11:59 PM


Buz, you're a moderator.
Dude. Rule 6.

PS

Is that all you've got?

"Garsh! It's awful durn com plee kated."?

A modern cell (complete with DNA, proteins, enzymes, etc.) is quite different from a proto-cell, dear.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 286 by Buzsaw, posted 12-27-2007 11:59 PM Buzsaw has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 289 by AdminPD, posted 12-28-2007 9:42 AM molbiogirl has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019