Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,453 Year: 3,710/9,624 Month: 581/974 Week: 194/276 Day: 34/34 Hour: 0/14


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolutionarily Drawn to Nature?
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1427 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 16 of 40 (490729)
12-07-2008 7:06 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by onifre
12-07-2008 6:40 PM


Re: Are people part of nature?
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder they say ...
With that said, I just came back from fishing in the Florida Keys today, (suffer Northerners! It was 80 degrees today in Miami ), and there is something beautiful and relaxing about drinking a beer on a boat and fishing that I don't think you can get from any top Hotel suite.
Curiously I just came back from two weeks in Puerto Rico, where 80° was common, and staying in resort hotels.
Today we had 2" of snow and it was wonderful to be back where people had weather ... I too used to be a boy scout, and then a scout leader, and my favorite campouts have all been winter campouts with snow. Nothing like sleeping out under the stars in a -40° bag laying on top of the snow (I tend to be a minimalist LNT camper).
Enjoy.
Edited by RAZD, : ,
Edited by RAZD, : -

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


• • • Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click) • • •

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by onifre, posted 12-07-2008 6:40 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by onifre, posted 12-08-2008 5:02 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied
 Message 26 by cavediver, posted 12-10-2008 5:48 AM RAZD has replied
 Message 31 by onifre, posted 12-25-2008 3:12 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3123 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 17 of 40 (490733)
12-07-2008 8:16 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by onifre
12-07-2008 6:40 PM


Re: Are people part of nature?
I travel a lot, im on about 6 flights per month. There is nothing like walking into a 4-5 Star Hotel, stepping foot into a high-end suite, and ordering room service while watching tv in your bower shorts. Then, laying down on a plush king size bed and getting under a goose down comforter. It's simply an awesome feeling after a long flight.
I have to agree with that one too onfire. My best hotel experience was getting paid by the Navy to stay at the five star Gulf Hotel in Bahrain. Talk about opulance. The bed was bigger was almost like two california kings side by side. I am 5'10" and I could lay across the width of the bed with arms outstretched and not touch either side of the bed. Also the dining was out of this world. I must of gained 20 lbs eating at a different restaurant inside the hotel every night: american food, japanes, chinese, international buffet and a english pub. Plus a fabulous pool to boot. Some of the best 30 days of my single life.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by onifre, posted 12-07-2008 6:40 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by onifre, posted 12-08-2008 5:18 PM DevilsAdvocate has replied

  
Blue Jay
Member (Idle past 2719 days)
Posts: 2843
From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts
Joined: 02-04-2008


Message 18 of 40 (490735)
12-07-2008 9:19 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by yetman
12-05-2008 9:46 PM


Hi, Yetman. Welcome to EvC!
yetman writes:
I think it's pleasurable to look at nature because, evolutionarily, it was beneficial to our survival. It was beneficial for someone to know his surroundings intimately.
I don't think it sounds all that beneficial to become entranced by pretty things around you. To me, it sounds like more of a distraction that allows predators or enemies to sneak up on you than a way to memorize the landscape. It seems more logical to me that a habitat-familiarity mechanism would be successful if it caused us to be attracted to things that are directly beneficial for our survival, like food, water and shelter, and not to flowers, butterflies and flames.
-----
I also wonder if it's not simple projection of a personal perspective onto the entire human species at large (Larni: what do they call that?). Without having actually done a poll, I'm pretty sure a large chunk of people I know don't really care for nature, so I'm hesitant to accept the premise of your thesis that people are innately drawn to nature.
I personally love nature (and campfires): I particularly like collecting bugs. But, I don't think I have personally felt a pleasure sensor tripping at the sight of nature without some sort of prior preparation or build-up. I also grew up as a city boy, and didn't ever get involved in nature until Boy Scouts, and, even then, it took me awhile to work up to enjoyment. So, to me, it seemed like more of an acquired taste.
So, that's one vote against the argument for an innate love of nature in humans. Take it for what it's worth. But I, personally, have a hard time assigning evolutionary significance to a trait that's not universal, or for which I'm not sure there is evidence that it's even particularly common.

-Bluejay
Darwin loves you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by yetman, posted 12-05-2008 9:46 PM yetman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by yetman, posted 12-07-2008 10:38 PM Blue Jay has not replied

  
yetman
Junior Member (Idle past 5607 days)
Posts: 7
Joined: 12-04-2008


Message 19 of 40 (490737)
12-07-2008 10:38 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by Blue Jay
12-07-2008 9:19 PM


Bluejay,
quote:
Hi, Yetman. Welcome to EvC!
Hello and thanks very much.
quote:
I don't think it sounds all that beneficial to become entranced by pretty things around you. To me, it sounds like more of a distraction that allows predators or enemies to sneak up on you than a way to memorize the landscape.
I think it would actually be an advantage against predators. Looking around, observing the environment closely would increase detection of potential predators, as well as instill a familiarity with the landscape.
quote:
It seems more logical to me that a habitat-familiarity mechanism would be successful if it caused us to be attracted to things that are directly beneficial for our survival, like food, water and shelter, and not to flowers, butterflies and flames.
We do have mechanisms for those necessities: hunger, thirst, and discomfort. In order to satisfy those needs, we'll need to know where to find the resources. For that very reason it's important to be familiar with the environment. This is why I believe we have evolved to enjoy observing natural scenery. If we're familiar with our territory, we'll know exactly where to find food, water, and shelter, and we'll know the best routes for travel or escape, thus increasing our chances of survival.
quote:
I also wonder if it's not simple projection of a personal perspective onto the entire human species at large (Larni: what do they call that?). Without having actually done a poll, I'm pretty sure a large chunk of people I know don't really care for nature, so I'm hesitant to accept the premise of your thesis that people are innately drawn to nature.
I haven't taken a poll either, and if a study has been done I would be interested in the results for sure. But from personal experience, I think typically people consider viewing a picture of natural scenery to be relaxing.
quote:
So, that's one vote against the argument for an innate love of nature in humans. Take it for what it's worth. But I, personally, have a hard time assigning evolutionary significance to a trait that's not universal, or for which I'm not sure there is evidence that it's even particularly common.
I don't think a study has been done to test if the trait is universal. It may not be, but I'm proposing that, for the most part, it is. I do think that looking at a picture of natural scenery is somewhat relaxing to most everyone, and more so when experienced firsthand. I think we have evolved to enjoy looking at natural scenery because of its survival benefits.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Blue Jay, posted 12-07-2008 9:19 PM Blue Jay has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 12-08-2008 6:00 AM yetman has replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3123 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 20 of 40 (490751)
12-08-2008 6:00 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by yetman
12-07-2008 10:38 PM


I don't think a study has been done to test if the trait is universal. It may not be, but I'm proposing that, for the most part, it is. I do think that looking at a picture of natural scenery is somewhat relaxing to most everyone, and more so when experienced firsthand. I think we have evolved to enjoy looking at natural scenery because of its survival benefits.
I think it depends on the experiences you had in the past as well. If you are stuck out in the wilderness during a blizzard or intense rainstorm you are not going to be relaxed and composed or "enjoying the scenery" (at least I wasn't), most likely you will be cursing yourself out for being so stupid to be out there. I also agree that it comes down to meeting your primordial needs of food, shelter, and other necessities first. Only after these are met do we attatch our emotions to things we would consider pleasurable i.e. traveling, meeting new people, walking in the woods, looking at a beuatiful painting, etc.
If your experiences in the past with nature for the most part have been pleasurable (spending time with family, etc) than most likely seeing a picture of nature will be relaxing to you, if on the other hand you never had good experiences out in nature than it would be the other way around. Some people can cope with nature better than others. It just depends on your outlook on nature and life in general.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by yetman, posted 12-07-2008 10:38 PM yetman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by yetman, posted 12-08-2008 4:41 PM DevilsAdvocate has not replied

  
yetman
Junior Member (Idle past 5607 days)
Posts: 7
Joined: 12-04-2008


Message 21 of 40 (490799)
12-08-2008 4:41 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by DevilsAdvocate
12-08-2008 6:00 AM


DevilsAdvocate writes:
I think it depends on the experiences you had in the past as well. If you are stuck out in the wilderness during a blizzard or intense rainstorm you are not going to be relaxed and composed or "enjoying the scenery" (at least I wasn't), most likely you will be cursing yourself out for being so stupid to be out there.
Of course, the basic needs always come first. If you had shelter you might've enjoyed the scenery regardless of the weather.
DevilsAdvocate writes:
If your experiences in the past with nature for the most part have been pleasurable (spending time with family, etc) than most likely seeing a picture of nature will be relaxing to you, if on the other hand you never had good experiences out in nature than it would be the other way around. Some people can cope with nature better than others. It just depends on your outlook on nature and life in general.
I think if you had a traumatic experience somewhere in nature, you might develop a negative association with that specific place or very similar places. That association works to your advantage to increase your chances of survival. You'll know to avoid that place because it might be dangerous. If you viewed a picture of that place, you would remember that experience and that would affect your feelings. But that probably wouldn't change your feelings toward natural scenery as a whole. I think if you look at a picture of some natural scenery, even if it is totally unfamiliar with you, you'll instinctually feel some level of relaxation, regardless of past experience.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 12-08-2008 6:00 AM DevilsAdvocate has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2972 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 22 of 40 (490802)
12-08-2008 5:02 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by RAZD
12-07-2008 7:06 PM


Re: Are people part of nature?
Hi RAZD,
Today we had 2" of snow and it was wonderful to be back where people had weather
Not that waking up to snow isn't beautiful, it is, but im Cuban raised in Miami, we aren't a people who are fond of the cold for too long.
Nothing like sleeping out under the stars in a -40 bag laying on top of the snow (I tend to be a minimalist LNT camper).
No doubt that camping is only enjoyed in cool/cold weather. I don't know if I'd enjoy laying on top of snow but, I can appreciate the peaceful beauty of it.
I too am a LNT style camper.

"All great truths begin as blasphemies"
"I smoke pot. If this bothers anyone, I suggest you look around at the world in which we live and shut your mouth."--Bill Hicks
"I never knew there was another option other than to question everything"--Noam Chomsky

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by RAZD, posted 12-07-2008 7:06 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2972 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 23 of 40 (490804)
12-08-2008 5:18 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by DevilsAdvocate
12-07-2008 8:16 PM


Re: Are people part of nature?
Hi DA,
My best hotel experience was getting paid by the Navy to stay at the five star Gulf Hotel in Bahrain.
One of the comics I know is part of Comedy Centrals "The Watch List"...
That Page Does Not Exist! Error 404 | Comedy Central US)
...and they frequently perform in Dubai(and all over the Middle East too). He told me the Middle East has some of the finest hotels in the world. 7 Star hotels!
I took a look at the link to the one you stayed at, looks amazing.
The bed was bigger was almost like two california kings side by side. I am 5'10" and I could lay across the width of the bed with arms outstretched and not touch either side of the bed. Also the dining was out of this world. I must of gained 20 lbs eating at a different restaurant inside the hotel every night: american food, japanes, chinese, international buffet and a english pub. Plus a fabulous pool to boot. Some of the best 30 days of my single life.
Isn't it amazing that a species who evolved outdoors takes so much pleasure indoors?
And, yea, I bet it was an amazing experience as a single man in such luxurious settings.
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

"All great truths begin as blasphemies"
"I smoke pot. If this bothers anyone, I suggest you look around at the world in which we live and shut your mouth."--Bill Hicks
"I never knew there was another option other than to question everything"--Noam Chomsky

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 12-07-2008 8:16 PM DevilsAdvocate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 12-08-2008 7:32 PM onifre has not replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3123 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 24 of 40 (490813)
12-08-2008 7:32 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by onifre
12-08-2008 5:18 PM


Re: Are people part of nature?
I think the 7 star hotel you are talking about is theBurj Al Arab in Dubai.
I have been to Dubai and Jubel Ali in the United Arab Emirates about 4 or 5 times and it never ceases to amaze me the granduer of these cities. They are litteraly built straight up from the sands of the desert surround them. No grass, very few trees, and construction all over the place. The Burj Al Arab is on a peninnsula which can only be accessed through a gated area in which you have to pay somewhere around $10-$20 to go through the gate even to take a look in the lobby (they won't let you unless you are in a suit or the arab thawb. I was flabergasted when I saw a helicopter land on the helo pad at the top of the hotel. The arabs of UAE have more money than they know what to do with.
Actually some of the richest people on earth try to marry these two seemingly diametrically opposed forms of relaxation: nature and oppulant hotels. Case in point are the resorts of the Caribbean.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by onifre, posted 12-08-2008 5:18 PM onifre has not replied

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4250 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 25 of 40 (490923)
12-09-2008 6:37 PM


by natural scenery do you mean pictures of mountains and forests and rivers and the like, or is it more your home region, maybe the mainstreet, or familiar areas?

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by yetman, posted 12-12-2008 1:34 AM Artemis Entreri has not replied

  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3665 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 26 of 40 (490942)
12-10-2008 5:48 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by RAZD
12-07-2008 7:06 PM


Re: Are people part of nature?
Nothing like sleeping out under the stars in a -40 bag laying on top of the snow
There are few better pleasures in life than being warm and dry in a bag in the midst of extreme elements Then again, there is always that moment of waking in a bag and realising that goretex will not prevent a newly formed river from flowing through your bag

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by RAZD, posted 12-07-2008 7:06 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by onifre, posted 12-10-2008 1:38 PM cavediver has not replied
 Message 28 by RAZD, posted 12-11-2008 9:13 PM cavediver has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2972 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 27 of 40 (490983)
12-10-2008 1:38 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by cavediver
12-10-2008 5:48 AM


Re: Are people part of nature?
Then again, there is always that moment of waking in a bag and realising that goretex will not prevent a newly formed river from flowing through your bag
,
That would never happen at the Ritz Carlton. Then again, I've seen some crazy things happen in hotels so I guess there's an equal trade off.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by cavediver, posted 12-10-2008 5:48 AM cavediver has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1427 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 28 of 40 (491128)
12-11-2008 9:13 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by cavediver
12-10-2008 5:48 AM


Re: Are people part of nature?
... there is always that moment of waking in a bag and realising that goretex will not prevent a newly formed river from flowing through your bag ...
Happened to me back in the late 50's, before tents had floors and mosquito netting, back when scouts "ditched" around their tents - which we had not done. The other scout in the tent is still a best friend.
I've been careful since (or lucky).
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


• • • Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click) • • •

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by cavediver, posted 12-10-2008 5:48 AM cavediver has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by bluescat48, posted 12-11-2008 9:29 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied
 Message 32 by Taz, posted 12-26-2008 12:02 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4211 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 29 of 40 (491129)
12-11-2008 9:29 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by RAZD
12-11-2008 9:13 PM


Re: Are people part of nature?
Although I never had a problem in a sleeping bag, 2 guys in a military unit I was evaluating, pitched their 2 Man pup-tent on a slight downgrade. Late that night a thunderstorm hit and the area they were in became a wash. They, in their sleeping bags became projectiles down the slope and into the stream at the bottom of the hill. Cold & wet awakening.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by RAZD, posted 12-11-2008 9:13 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
yetman
Junior Member (Idle past 5607 days)
Posts: 7
Joined: 12-04-2008


Message 30 of 40 (491140)
12-12-2008 1:34 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by Artemis Entreri
12-09-2008 6:37 PM


Artemis Entreri writes:
by natural scenery do you mean pictures of mountains and forests and rivers and the like
Yeah, I mean places that resemble natural environment, whether viewed in person or in photograph.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Artemis Entreri, posted 12-09-2008 6:37 PM Artemis Entreri has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024