randman writes:
The site has some bogus stuff, but it's not all bogus.
The problem with this is twofold:
1. The site presents it all as non-bogus. So, either the makers of the site do not know they are presenting bogus, in which case they are not much of an authority on the subject matter, or they do know, in which case they are not to be trusted. Either way, the site loses its credibility.
2. How do
we know which is the bogus info and which isn't? The site doesn't tell us. Can we know it from somewhere else? Or can we just pick and choose the parts that suit us?
I think you've shot yourself in the foot with this link.
"We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further." - Richard Dawkins
™ Version 4.2