The Anasazi Drawing:
To me it looks like the man and the dino were drawn by different people. The man is drawn with straight lines, even his head looks square and the dino is all curvy. Plus the dino has a smiley face, come on now . the man has no features on his face at all.
I would conclude that it is fake.
The Ica stones:
Also fake. They pictures of the dinos look way too influenced by our modern (1980s-ish) depictions to be done by ancient people.
arachnophilia writes:
what the heck is this? . .. i'll ive you a hint: it's a totally known creature, alive today.
What is it already!?
Mokele-mbembe
I think this guy
is running around out there. But I don’t think that a modern sauropod would discredit the ToE very much, if at all. Opinions?
Here is the story on
Mokele-mbembe. This part, if true, is convincing to me.
quote:
To lend support to the theory that Mokele-mbembe is a remnant of the dinosauria, the pygmies have been given a certain test many times over. The test involves a group of pictures of animals that live in the area. The pygmies would recognize the drawings of leopards, gorillas, and elephants, among other creatures. After this, they would be shown a depiction of a typical sauropod. The pygmies usually replied with a simple, instantaneous reply, "It's Mokele-mbembe!"
Giants (non-human)
Check out this
giantology site. There’s some cool pictures and videos on there. Does everyone think the tsunami video is a hoax? It looks pretty bad to me, but I do wonder what implications, if any, something like this could have on the ToE. Any ideas?
™ Version 4.2