quicksink: Good questions. I hope to see some good answers.
Retro: I don't think the technique quicksink is employing here is invalid. S/He's being a lot more generous than most creationists by offering a smorgasboard of question from which the creationists only have to answer ONE. Debating the evolution side on a board like this I often feel I need PhD's in every discipline from genetics, biology, geology, chemistry, physics, archeology, information science, to astronomy and microbiology. Creationists seem to think that if you can't refute every single detail of every single creationist author back to the hypothetical writer of Genesis 1, then creationism is proven and the ToE fails.
Let's give respondants a chance to provide some real evidence for a change. That appears to be what quicksink is asking for...
™ Version 4.2