QUESTIONS

Joz & TC,Take a look here, http://www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/dm.cgi?action=page&f=1&t=29&p=12 , message 181 (last half) dealing with problems of flood sorting fossils. I got bored pointing out all the problems with TCs "model" (not that he presented one). You, along with myself & others will be back & forth for aeons with this example & that, & get exactly nowhere.So take a leaf out of my book & join me in pushing for TCs "flood model of fossil deposition". No more single examples, no more "these are cleverer, these will live longer, these can fly". A model that can be universally applied please.TC, please present. Message 181 went unanswered & is relevant to the discussion here.Mark------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.

TC,It's the model that Joz & I are after, we will then attempt to falsify it. Incidentally, since you are always telling us that it's the evidence thats interpreted wrong, perhaps you could do the same with the flood model. A tall order, I know, but the flood model has a direct impact on the deposition. Before, you had boiling water when it suited you, & cool water when it didn't. Fish died early when it suited you, later when it didn't. So the flood model THAT THE EVIDENCE POINTS TO is a relevant backdrop to this discussion, no need for details, just a bullet point list of events. It's the geological deposition of fossils that we're discussing in detail, we can carry on in the original thread if you want to continue with the flood feasibility.Mark------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.