Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,869 Year: 4,126/9,624 Month: 997/974 Week: 324/286 Day: 45/40 Hour: 4/7


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Big Bang...How Did it Happen?
joz
Inactive Member


Message 78 of 414 (93158)
03-18-2004 2:02 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by Navy10E
03-18-2004 1:23 PM


Einstein did indeed come up with several theories to that effect. But again, I ask for specific experiments demontrating that they have been proven true.
If your talking about Gen Relativity the way it explains the excess precession of Mercurys orbit (0.01 degrees per century) has always been considered something of a strong point...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by Navy10E, posted 03-18-2004 1:23 PM Navy10E has not replied

joz
Inactive Member


Message 108 of 414 (93731)
03-21-2004 6:59 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by Navy10E
03-21-2004 8:55 AM


quote:
The first: Expanding Space. How do we know that space is expanding?
You were already told....
Hubble red shift of galaxies....
Now if you don't think that the red shift shows the universe is expanding what is YOUR explanation? I mean surely you have an alternate way of explaining the data?
And may I suggest that "it doesn't make sense to me" is a damm stupid arguement unless you can back it up....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by Navy10E, posted 03-21-2004 8:55 AM Navy10E has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by Chiroptera, posted 03-21-2004 7:11 PM joz has replied

joz
Inactive Member


Message 110 of 414 (93741)
03-21-2004 8:03 PM
Reply to: Message 109 by Chiroptera
03-21-2004 7:11 PM


Yep interestingly the two fellas who found it weren't even looking for it, they found it by accident while trying to use the Bell antenna for something else....
Still I'm kind of interested in how he explains observed red shifts bar an inflating universe...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Chiroptera, posted 03-21-2004 7:11 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 111 by Navy10E, posted 03-23-2004 4:39 AM joz has replied

joz
Inactive Member


Message 139 of 414 (94136)
03-23-2004 1:19 PM
Reply to: Message 121 by crashfrog
03-23-2004 5:37 AM


Big Bang cosmology isn't synonymous with atheism.
Just to add to Crash's point here I'd like to ask Navy why he thinks that a catholic priest (Lemaitre) would propose such a notion if it was so clearly an arguement against the exsistence of God and the biblical narrative?
Hmmmm catholic priest proposing atheistic theory, something isn't right there....
Maybe Navy would also be interested to know that the big bang at first had something of an uphill struggle, because of the theological implications of everything coming from nothing, untill the evidence started rolling in....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by crashfrog, posted 03-23-2004 5:37 AM crashfrog has not replied

joz
Inactive Member


Message 140 of 414 (94139)
03-23-2004 1:30 PM
Reply to: Message 111 by Navy10E
03-23-2004 4:39 AM


My personal favorite is Isaiah 40:22, "It is He who sits above the circle* of the earth, and it's inhabitants are like grasshoppers, Who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them out like a tent to dwell in."
Then again curtains and tents are usually pullled taut but not made to expand...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by Navy10E, posted 03-23-2004 4:39 AM Navy10E has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 142 by Navy10E, posted 03-23-2004 2:11 PM joz has not replied

joz
Inactive Member


Message 146 of 414 (94291)
03-23-2004 11:55 PM
Reply to: Message 141 by Lizard Breath
03-23-2004 1:49 PM


Re: Casimir effect
Basically during about the first 10-43s of the universes exsistence all four forces were unified (we aren't quite sure how yet we still need a theory of quantum gravity but that one will be cracked eventually)...
During that period quarks and leptons were indistinguishable and quantum numbers were not conserved...
Quarks and antiquarks changed from one to the other freely and at t = 10-43s there was a slight excess of quarks over antiquarks (about 1 in 109)...
And a good job too because when the rest of the quarks and antiquarks anihilated that slight excess became our universe...
The Casimir effect that we observe happens with the four fundamental forces seperate and thus it creates equal ammounts of matter and antimatter and quantum numbers are conserved...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by Lizard Breath, posted 03-23-2004 1:49 PM Lizard Breath has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024