The Big Bang is NOT Scientific

Ok, I'll try. It should be noted that what is presented as scientific evidence is almost always not limited to discussion forums. It takes a life time for a person to research and study the evidence in science. The least you could do is show some respect. I'm curious to what you know about the redshift. What does the redshift indicate? How does redshift support the big bang theory?The reason I'm asking you these questions is because I don't really know where you're going with this argument. You need to be more specific before we can advance any further. How do you explain the michelson-morley experiment? What about the time dilation effect on the GPS satellites? Read this link. Because it made predictions that have been proven accurate years after they were made. But we do observe many evidence of it, though.Your understanding of what science is is very limited. Perhaps you should have asked questions rather than making assertions that are just wrong. At this point, I would ask that all who agree with lost-apathy to respond with an "aye".

The reason I asked those questions wasn't to find out how much you can quote from people. I wanted to see how much you know about these things before we can proceed. You must understand my precautions. I don't like talking to deaf ears or blind eyes. I've talked to many people before only to find out after a while that they had no clue what I was talking about.So, again, please tell us what part of red shift supposedly supported big bang.Added by edit.By the way, your link gave me the following page. I really don't see what this has to do with what we are talking about.This message has been edited by Troy, 04-27-2005 10:50 PMThis message has been edited by Admin, 04-28-2005 09:38 AM

Looks more and more to me like he doesn't really read or pay attention to everything and only pick and choose what he sees to reinforce his preconceived notions. I had a bad feeling when I posted the link.

Just so you know, at least one person you have conversed with in this thread (who have disagreed with you) is a PhD physicist. Try to guess which one(s). There are more than a few in this thread who hold PhD of some various fields of science.The number of PhD's on this forum probably equal the number of non-PhD's. So please don't assume the rest of us are dumbasses who have our heads inside our asses all day long. You are suffering from what is known here as a pile-on. It usually happens when some smartass who memorized 2 words from his high school text book and thinks he could impress everybody with them makes incredible and rediculous claims. People like to pile on because it's fun, amusing, and easy to.Since you haven't really addressed my points earlier without misrepresenting the material I posted, I think I'll sit out and watch this one from now on.

Just in case you're still here, you might be interested in reading the news article I'm linking to.ABC.net.au: Page Not Found

Sylas, one of these days...