The Big Bang is NOT Scientific

I didnt look very far down (i have a short attention span) but just one bit of info: In my past experience I have come to realize that explosions destroy order, not create it.Just a thought

Well thats what my science books sound like. Let me quote one:From: The Visual Dictionary of the Universe (Eyewittness Visual Dictionarys) DK publishing and all that other stuff)"...The most widely accepted theory about the origin of the Universe is the big bang theory, which states that universe came into being in a huge EXPLOSION-the Big Bang-that took place 10 to 20 billion years ago...."Notice the word "EXPLOSION" (emphasis added)Another book:From: The Nature Company Discoveries Library: Stars and Planets"...Most astronomers believe that between 8 and 16 billion years ago all matter and energy, even space itself, were concentrated in a single point. There was a tremendous EXPLOSION-the Big Bang-and within a few minutes the basic materials of the universe, such as hydrogen and helium, came to be...."Again notice the word "EXPLOSION" (emphasis added)If that is not what most astronomers beleive, considering those are the only books that are in my house which mention the big bang and are not Abeca books, I have a reason to believe that you (evolutionists) believe that the big bang was an explosion.There is no scientific evidence for the big bang. There isnt even stuff like a fossil record or anything to go by. The big bang is simply an idea that arose when people were searching for a theory for the begining of the world. It is just a theory at that. and when you listen to it it sounds rediculous.but that wont change any minds, so carry on

I havent heard any evidence, just assumptions.Reply to point 1) I thought that gravity pulls things together. My old science teacher has said that if you had an empty universe and put two pencils on oposite sides of the universe they would move twords one another, not away. And all that proves is that there is a core to the universe, not that there was some explosion or rapid expansion of very hot gasses.And that still doesnt explain anything. Something cant be created out of nothing, its not possible. Saying that there was a single atom or molocule in the begining that created everything is farfeched, and saying that everything was very compact (dont argue my definitions please) is not solving anything, because it all still had to be there, unless you are saying that the laws of phisics were different which leads to the absurd statement that the big bang changed physics. If you were to say that the matter existed forever, then you would have to believe in infinity, which means that a very long time ago there was a universe EXACTLY like this one with people siting at their computers doing the exact same thing we are doing right now, and if you dont beleive that you cant beleive that the matter has existed forever. If you say the world came from a single atom or molocule, then aside from the argument of where that came from, you would have to say that the laws of phisics were changed as they would have been if all mater was compact (as I mentioned earlyer).I could go on but i am guessing yuor brains hurt. If you need me to explain anything just ask.

Something cant come out of nothing. it is a law of science. I know several people who beleive evolution, but can admit that the big bang is not very likely to have happened.This message has been edited by Genghis Khan II, 03-22-2006 07:08 PM