I notice that that article relies quite heavy on the Work of Barry Setterfield - the mainstream community thinks he is a crank. Now you might say "well of course they do! Because of their world view!"
Problem is -
Answers in Genesis always rejects his work. Why do you think a major creation science organization rejects his work?
Paul Davies is also mentioned that and this is what AIG had to say about his work -
Dr Russell Humphreys writes:
Paul Davies’ Nature article itself falls far short of the hype, which is much ado about nearly nothing. General Relativity has had a variable speed of light ever since 1917. For the past six years, the physics journals have had a steady trickle of variable-c theories, including some by Davies. His latest article is only peripherally about a variable c. So why all the fuss?’
So if this is all about secular bias - why aren't christian science organizations backing it?
Edited by CK, : No reason given.
Edited by Admin, : Reflects => rejects.
Edited by Admin, : why => what
™ Version 4.2