Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Problems with the Big Bang theory
vitalprikalist
Inactive Member


Message 172 of 303 (369052)
12-11-2006 2:56 PM


Big Bang
Here are a couple of definitions of the big bang.
""A broadly accepted theory for the origin and evolution of our universe. The theory says that the universe started expanding roughly 14 billion years ago from an extremely dense and incredibly hot initial state.
Page not found – Contemporary Physics Education Project
The primeval explosion which most astronomers think gave rise to the universe as we see it today, in which clusters of galaxies are moving apart from one another. By "running the film backward'' ” projecting the galaxies' motions backward of time ” astronomers calculate that the Big Bang happened about 10 to 15 billion years ago.
Programs-at-a-Glance : EDUCATION : Astronomical Society of the Pacific
The explosion and rapid explansion of matter that occurred at the creation of our universe. In the immediate aftermath of the Big Bang, all matter is thought to have consisted of free quarks and gluons at extremely high temperatures and densities. This plasma then cooled and coalesced into the particles and atoms that now make up all objects in the universe.
http://www.bnl.gov/rhic/glossary.htm
""
I could go on. The theory as it appears above, and what most people believe it to be is flawed.
Flaw : when something explodes, the particles that fly off all spin in the same direction. The direction of the spinning before the explosion. This contradicts what we observe today. Planets and possibly galaxies spinning in completely oppostie directions.
will post more later. Have to go

Replies to this message:
 Message 173 by Chiroptera, posted 12-11-2006 3:13 PM vitalprikalist has not replied
 Message 174 by cavediver, posted 12-11-2006 3:30 PM vitalprikalist has not replied
 Message 175 by Percy, posted 12-11-2006 4:01 PM vitalprikalist has replied

vitalprikalist
Inactive Member


Message 248 of 303 (369889)
12-15-2006 11:09 AM
Reply to: Message 175 by Percy
12-11-2006 4:01 PM


Re: Big Bang
Percy, notice that all you did is disclaim what I said. You didn't brong on any evidence. What doess physics say. Can you quote it and why didn't you. You are trying to raise yourself to the level of scientist with supremem knowledge, yet you didn't even include reasons that contradict what I said. That is your problem. And another thing, you don't know jack about me, or my majors, so back off.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by Percy, posted 12-11-2006 4:01 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 249 by Chiroptera, posted 12-15-2006 11:21 AM vitalprikalist has not replied
 Message 250 by jar, posted 12-15-2006 11:44 AM vitalprikalist has not replied
 Message 253 by Percy, posted 12-15-2006 1:18 PM vitalprikalist has not replied
 Message 254 by NosyNed, posted 12-15-2006 1:25 PM vitalprikalist has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024