Correct, and a good reasoning to dismiss space as an entity when it is non-existent; I see this as a back-door to bring in an infinite aspect to the finite universe. My point here is, that nothingness is outside of our mind's fathoming, and none should resort to it. Nothingness represents a realm where none of the post universe products exist, and there is no way we can identify with it - there is no space, matter or vision, so there is nothing to connect to.
I think you're catching on. There
is nothing to connect to, because there is nothing there.
This is not a "back-door" to creating an infinite universe from a finite one or vice versa because what the maths produce is what describes our universe, nothing more. There is no solid theory surrounding what might be beyond what we know right now (although there is speculation). There is nothing. The singularity describes a point where our math breaks down. Nothing is known beyond that. Similarly, there is no "out there" beyond our universe because that question makes no sense. If it were known, then it would be a part of the universe (or of a multiverse if that was known).
Just because we cannot fathom what is out there (if anything) does not make any idea "god." Nor does it make any
a posteriori ideas based on the OT "true" no matter how you want to twist the words of Genesis to make it try to fit what you know of physics and cosmology.
"You are metaphysicians. You can prove anything by metaphysics; and having done so, every metaphysician can prove every other metaphysician wrong--to his own satisfaction. You are anarchists in the realm of thought. And you are mad cosmos-makers. Each of you dwells in a cosmos of his own making, created out of his own fancies and desires. You do not know the real world in which you live, and your thinking has no place in the real world except in so far as it is phenomena of mental aberration." -
The Iron Heel by Jack London
"Hazards exist that are not marked" - some bar in Chelsea