I see the science mechanisms you use (above) as abstract mechanisms vaguely understood by your best scientists to absolve your universe hypothesis accountability for the mysterious and philosophical (bizzare) possibilities of it. Science does not grant our hypothesis that luxury.
And there is a reason for this, Buz.
To most of us QM is as undecipherable as trying to understand women. But there are those around who do understand, if not all, great swaths of QM, though I doubt if even they can understand women.
The difference between QM and your religious speculations (they do not qualify as hypotheses) is that QM is mathematically consistent and grounded in First Principles (if you don’t know what this means then look it up) while your religious speculations are grounded in nothing but your emotions.
The two do not compare.