Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,479 Year: 3,736/9,624 Month: 607/974 Week: 220/276 Day: 60/34 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   bulletproof alternate universe
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 22 of 308 (95189)
03-27-2004 6:53 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by simple
03-27-2004 5:54 PM


Re: cosmic balance
'creation' evolution debate forum, not just an evo one.
And why don't we debate something a bit simpler than all the esoteric cosmology? It is clear that the math is way to hard for most all of us here so we can leave it alone for now.
How about you jump into the dating area if you happen to think the earth is only 6,000 years old. After all if the earth is older then we don't need all this talk of light speed changes and stuff do we?
If you can show how it is only 6,000 years old then I'd say you've kinda done the ToE in with one swipe of that sword. It would sure change my mind in a hurry.
Care to try? It's not as fancy as all the fancy math involved in quantum mechanics and general relativity. While you may understand all that math, I don't so it would be fun to stick to something we all understand, right? Some parts just involve counting things. I'm sure we can all count, can't we?
You could start by adding some comments to Where are the young earthers?
Then try your hand at:
Age Correlations and an Old Earth and
Greenland Ice Cores
Since you probably think there is lots of good science on dating at the various creationists sites you shouldn't have any trouble finding material to handle the topics in those threads.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by simple, posted 03-27-2004 5:54 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by simple, posted 03-27-2004 7:32 PM NosyNed has replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 25 of 308 (95202)
03-27-2004 8:03 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by simple
03-27-2004 7:32 PM


Re: cosmic balance
That's only one aspect of the invisible universe, what about things we know about that could be a by product of the seperation, or some redshifting or something that could be applied to indicate a soon re merging?
Tha is all gobbledy gook. You can what if all you want but you're gont to have do do some very hard math to make something that hangs together and explains what is seen.
You can carry on with all this stuff if you want. What I'm suggesting is that you have to handle an old earth in your 6,000 year old universe. If you can't then you don't need to both with all this wild eyed speculation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by simple, posted 03-27-2004 7:32 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by simple, posted 03-27-2004 10:36 PM NosyNed has not replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 52 of 308 (95434)
03-28-2004 4:46 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by simple
03-28-2004 4:08 PM


Re: redshift faced
Still wondering why you don't want to discuss the age of the earth iteself. Can you explain that?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by simple, posted 03-28-2004 4:08 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by simple, posted 03-28-2004 5:45 PM NosyNed has replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 58 of 308 (95445)
03-28-2004 5:50 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by simple
03-28-2004 5:45 PM


Re: redshift faced
That's why there are other threads. You could drop in to them. Since you are just speculating about stuff here you're wasting your time if the earth is clearly much, much older than 6,000 years. The earth we can walk right up to and mess around with in labs.
I am rather forced to the conclusion that you know very well you can't answer the relatively simple evidence put forward there. Here, you actually think you are fooling someone with all the mumbo-jumbo. (and I would have to confess, since some keep replying to you maybe you are )

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by simple, posted 03-28-2004 5:45 PM simple has not replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 60 of 308 (95448)
03-28-2004 5:57 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by RAZD
03-28-2004 5:29 PM


Re: invalidated worthless fantasy
Why bother? It is time to stop feeding trolls.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by RAZD, posted 03-28-2004 5:29 PM RAZD has not replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 178 of 308 (96770)
04-01-2004 9:22 PM
Reply to: Message 176 by simple
04-01-2004 9:11 PM


Re: king's highway
This is all more than enough. Time to ignore fools like this.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 176 by simple, posted 04-01-2004 9:11 PM simple has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 179 by Eta_Carinae, posted 04-01-2004 9:29 PM NosyNed has not replied
 Message 199 by Trixie, posted 04-02-2004 3:12 PM NosyNed has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024