Quantum physics: Copenhagen vs decoherence interpretations

Daniel Dubois, Robert Rosen, Karl Pribram, Stuart Kaufmann are several other scientists who have theory that supports free wil. I also see much comment that they perceive themselves as fighting the big mainstream reductionist group, with many issues having opposing free explanations and a reductionist explanation. For example red-shift by big bang according to reductionists, and redshift by newly formed galaxies according to the "decisionists". That is the big paradigm-shift in science that is waiting to happen since many decades.

Well spoken, like an ideal atheist. You pressure science on people with such force, while at the same time you say it is depressingly nihilistic. I also wonder how for instance people will be ready to be a judge or juror, when they havent learned to differentiate free behaviour from forced behaviour.Strange that you would object to weirdness of toothbrushes deciding in a thread about quantummechanics. Evidently you know very little about the weird findings of qm in regards to interrference, and whichway information.And you are right that I loathe science, and scientists generally also. But even I can understand that fundamentally there is a generally free will paradigm, and a generally causal paradigm, since the scientists talk about these 2 fundamental paradigms commonly. You dismissed the free will paradigm, so nice going for getting nowhere at all in discussing quantum mechanics.