Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 76 (8908 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 05-21-2019 9:38 AM
35 online now:
AZPaul3, Diomedes, JonF, kjsimons, Percy (Admin), Tanypteryx, vimesey (7 members, 28 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WeloTemo
Post Volume:
Total: 851,674 Year: 6,711/19,786 Month: 1,252/1,581 Week: 74/393 Day: 7/50 Hour: 2/3

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Quantized redshifts strongly suggest that our galaxy is at the centre of the universe
Inactive Member

Message 141 of 170 (16997)
09-09-2002 11:37 AM
Reply to: Message 133 by Tranquility Base
09-02-2002 10:35 PM

Tranquility Base Wrote:

"Humphreys' work is a great example of a scientific model. From postulates to mathematical model. It's now up the data to rule it out or not. "

Well, since Humphrey's work has been elevated from it's previous status of 'Poor quality science fiction', perhaps you'd care to answer a question that you previously avoided by claiming that Humphrey's work was 'an interesting supposition'.

In Humphrey's 'model', the universe starts out as a multiple light year diameter sphere of water.
If this were the starting matter for the universe, we should see a universe in which 14/16ths (by mass) or 1/3 by count of atoms,of the free matter between the stars was oxygen.
Oddly, we see a universe which is almost entirely hydrogen and helium.

Why should this be?
Where did all the oxygen go?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by Tranquility Base, posted 09-02-2002 10:35 PM Tranquility Base has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 142 by Tranquility Base, posted 09-09-2002 11:47 AM Weyland has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019