Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,453 Year: 3,710/9,624 Month: 581/974 Week: 194/276 Day: 34/34 Hour: 14/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   New Big Bang Cosmology
Gup20
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 48 (106628)
05-08-2004 3:40 PM


What do you guys think of the new cosmology proposed by Smoller/Temple
http://www.pubmedcentral.com/articlerender.fcgi?artid=208737
Here is the Abstract to their paper:
We construct a class of global exact solutions of the Einstein equations that extend the Oppeheimer—Snyder model to the case of nonzero pressure, inside the black hole, by incorporating a shock wave at the leading edge of the expansion of the galaxies, arbitrarily far beyond the Hubble length in the Friedmann—Robertson—Walker (FRW) spacetime. Here the expanding FRW universe emerges be-hind a subluminous blast wave that explodes outward from the FRW center at the instant of the big bang. The total mass behind the shock decreases as the shock wave expands, and the entropy condition implies that the shock wave must weaken to the point where it settles down to an Oppenheimer—Snyder interface, (bounding a finite total mass), that eventually emerges from the white hole event horizon of an ambient Schwarzschild spacetime. The entropy condition breaks the time symmetry of the Einstein equations, selecting the explosion over the implosion. These shock-wave solutions indicate a cosmological model in which the big bang arises from a localized explosion occurring inside the black hole of an asymptotically flat Schwarzschild spacetime.
The main deviations here is that the 'big bang' cosmology contains a universe center and an edge. They talk about everything coming from a white hole.
also check their oral description - Index of /~temple/articles
This message has been edited by Gup20, 05-08-2004 02:50 PM

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 2 of 48 (106642)
05-08-2004 4:57 PM


Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
Beercules
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 48 (106659)
05-08-2004 6:01 PM


quote:
These shock-wave solutions indicate a cosmological model in which the big bang arises from a localized explosion occurring inside the black hole of an asymptotically flat Schwarzschild spacetime.
And what is going on with the background spacetime? Expansion? Contraction? It seems to be in the same boat as the idea that life on earth originated on Mars. Interesting idea, but pushes the question of origins back a notch.

  
RingoKid
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 48 (106706)
05-08-2004 11:25 PM


hmmm...
...a leading edge, a middle and a frontier where known physical laws breakdown as inside the singularties.
shock waves...eh ??? that reminds me of ripples in a spherical pond and all embedded in a higher medium a "white hole" of singular nothingness that is only relative to itself
that sounds like something i thought of too but with less proof...
now i wonder if they can make the black holes lead to the edge or middle and appear as tendrils extending back thru spacetime and acting as balance mechanisms to maintain equilibrium around a fixed central expansion point or even make them detachable to become wormholes...
So does that model imply a universe resembling the skinned membrane of a bubble that is 13.7 billion light years thick but when veiwed from a point outside of the expanding sphere would resemble a bubble infinitely large and would it not then also allow for consequent ripples of the initial blast to exist as alternate universes
...time will tell and i got nothing to lose
but it seems that deafening silence is becoming a roar that may well resonate thru the entire universe and beyond

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Gup20, posted 05-10-2004 1:45 PM RingoKid has not replied

  
Gup20
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 48 (107127)
05-10-2004 1:45 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by RingoKid
05-08-2004 11:25 PM


Re: hmmm...
Their model is based on the concept of a white hole - which is basically a black hole running in reverse. The 'edge' would be the event horizon of the white hole. Time, as it were, would be a result of the relativity between objects near the center and objects near the edge.
I will get to the reason I ask the question later tonight or tomorrow.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by RingoKid, posted 05-08-2004 11:25 PM RingoKid has not replied

  
Gup20
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 48 (107577)
05-11-2004 6:42 PM


Humphrey's Cosmology
The reason I ask, is because this model proposed by Smoller/Temple has been proposed (in part) before by Dr. Russel Humphreys in his book Starlight & Time (D.R. Humphreys, Starlight and Time, Master Books, Green Forest, Arkansas, 1994.) also proposed a Cosmology which had 'white hole' type features such as a center and an edge (event horizon).
The 'big bang' theory has long held the belief that there is no center and no edge to the universe. The Slaon Digital Sky Survey team has develped the best three-dimentional map of the universe to date, mapping over 200,000 galaxies up to two billion light years away. This map (which you can see here) shows clear concentric circles as you get farther and farther out from the center. This fits with the Humphreys and smoller/temple view that there was an explosion of finate mass with a center and an edge. The density distribution of galaxies WAS expected to increase with distance in a 'big bang' universe. On the map, the galaxy density seems to oscillate with distance hence the circular structures.
See Exploding the big bang!

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Eta_Carinae, posted 05-11-2004 7:41 PM Gup20 has not replied

  
Eta_Carinae
Member (Idle past 4396 days)
Posts: 547
From: US
Joined: 11-15-2003


Message 7 of 48 (107590)
05-11-2004 7:41 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Gup20
05-11-2004 6:42 PM


Re: Humphrey's Cosmology
Gup20,
Your post highlights that you do not understand what you are seeing in the SDSS map.
Please go read some of the Sloan papers describing the maps. You will then learn why your simple interpretation is totally wrong.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Gup20, posted 05-11-2004 6:42 PM Gup20 has not replied

  
cshumway89
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 48 (107595)
05-11-2004 8:11 PM


God is real!
Sorry guys God is real. He lives in each of us. Jesus was sent down on to earth to die for our sins. He died doing nothing wrong at all. Jesus was real. He did live. Floating matter just doesnt swirl around utnil something is made. Something had to put us here. And you better change or you won't go to heaven. Believe.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Christian,
CS

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by coffee_addict, posted 05-11-2004 8:13 PM cshumway89 has not replied
 Message 10 by AdminNosy, posted 05-11-2004 8:19 PM cshumway89 has not replied
 Message 11 by jar, posted 05-11-2004 8:19 PM cshumway89 has not replied
 Message 12 by AdminAsgara, posted 05-11-2004 8:21 PM cshumway89 has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 499 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 9 of 48 (107596)
05-11-2004 8:13 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by cshumway89
05-11-2004 8:11 PM


Re: God is real!
cshumway89 writes:
Sorry guys God is real. He lives in each of us. Jesus was sent down on to earth to die for our sins. He died doing nothing wrong at all. Jesus was real. He did live. Floating matter just doesnt swirl around utnil something is made. Something had to put us here. And you better change or you won't go to heaven. Believe.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Christian,
And this has what to do with cosmology?

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by cshumway89, posted 05-11-2004 8:11 PM cshumway89 has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 10 of 48 (107599)
05-11-2004 8:19 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by cshumway89
05-11-2004 8:11 PM


Topic!
As noted it is expected that you will attempt to remain on topic. All of us wander a bit astray now and then but you will be reminded when you do.
There are guidelines in this forum and there is enforcement. Although we try to give everyone a lot of lee way.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by cshumway89, posted 05-11-2004 8:11 PM cshumway89 has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 11 of 48 (107600)
05-11-2004 8:19 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by cshumway89
05-11-2004 8:11 PM


Thank you for that commercial
and now back to the regularly scheduled discussion.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by cshumway89, posted 05-11-2004 8:11 PM cshumway89 has not replied

  
AdminAsgara
Administrator (Idle past 2324 days)
Posts: 2073
From: The Universe
Joined: 10-11-2003


Message 12 of 48 (107601)
05-11-2004 8:21 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by cshumway89
05-11-2004 8:11 PM


Re: God is real!
Hi cshumway89,
Welcome to EvC. We have multiple fora here with numerous threads in each. We try to stay on topic and the topic here is New Big Bang Cosmology in the forum Big Bang and Cosmology.
Please take any discussion of religion to one of the many religion threads in the following fora
Sheesh..it helps to close out your lists...
This message has been edited by AdminAsgara, 05-12-2004 03:23 PM

AdminAsgara
Queen of the Universe

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by cshumway89, posted 05-11-2004 8:11 PM cshumway89 has not replied

  
extremophile
Member (Idle past 5617 days)
Posts: 53
Joined: 08-23-2003


Message 13 of 48 (107630)
05-11-2004 11:03 PM


I've read that some YECs says that this is someway favorable to them, but OECs says that is not, I think I saw it in a site called "science watch" or something.

  
Beercules
Inactive Member


Message 14 of 48 (107713)
05-12-2004 11:43 AM


quote:
The 'big bang' theory has long held the belief that there is no center and no edge to the universe.
That's not necessarily a postulate of the big bang. The assumption of a centerless universe comes from the cosmological principle, which would still be in effect even if there was no big bang. The model above doesn't seem to change this, since our local big bang took place within a pre-existing spacetime. This doesn't offer an explanation of the origin of the entire universe.

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by Gup20, posted 05-12-2004 2:11 PM Beercules has not replied

  
Gup20
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 48 (107728)
05-12-2004 2:11 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Beercules
05-12-2004 11:43 AM


This doesn't offer an explanation of the origin of the entire universe.
The smoller/temple paper does not, however, Physicist Dr. Russel Humphrey's cosmology does. Indeed it takes the position that the universe has a center and an edge and that we are at or near the center.
Humphreys is a Young Earth Creationist. He believes this cosmology answers some of the questions the traditional 'big bang' theory leaves open.
Not being a physicist myself, let me try to give you my interpretation of what I think he is trying to say -
Being a literal creationist, we would believe that the earth and the universe were created according to the account in Genesis. Here are the verses we will reference (they are essential to the YE-creationist view of the creation of time and space).
Gen 1:3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
Gen 1:4 And God saw the light, that [it was] good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
Gen 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
We see that God created light, and then separated light from darkness. He called it day and night. THEN, the first mention of TIME is recorded in the Bible - evening, morning, were the first day. Lets break that down -
1. God created light. In other scriptures it says that God is light. God is eternal, therefore we can surmise that God is separating time from eternity. God is creating our 'space/time continuum' as it were. This is further supported scientifically. Look at Einstein's theory - E=MC^2. Energy and mass are dependent on the constant of the 'speed of light'. Even Newton's equasions on Gravity are based on mass. Moreover, the way we often measure gravity is by acceleration which is a speed calculation - distance and time. So, we can see that the very laws of the universe are insepperable from light and time. In creating light, God basically created the 'constants' he would need from which all the laws of the universe follow.
2. God separated light from darkness and called the light day and the darkness night. Here we see the clear separation of 'eternity' from 'time'. If God is light and God is eternal, we can see that separating light from dark is actually the creation of time. It is very important to note that God does not create the sun or stars until day 4 - so this light here is NOT physical light from the sun.
3. The evening and the morning were the first day. This is also very important. If we do a word study in the Bible - the Hebrew word YOM is used for 'day'. Whenever YOM is used in conjunction with 'evening' it always means a literal (1 earth revolution) day. Whenever YOM is used in conjunction with the word morning, it always means 1 literal day. Whenever YOM is used in conjuction with a number (such as the word 'first') it always means a literal day. So from this verse we can accurately see that this is the first mention in the bible of literal passing of time. However, like I mentioned, the sun, moon, and stars have not yet been created - that happens on day4. This is further indication that it was written this way to give the reader an accurate representation of the ammount of time that was passing. One literal day.
So, in summery - God creates light, separates it from darkness, and in doing so starts time - which is evidenced by the 'begining of the clock' when he says 'the evening and morning were the first day'. The purpose of DAY 1 of the creative week was the creation of all space, time, and energy.
One of the unanswered questions of the creation of the universe (as it relates to the 'big bang') that creationists got were 'if the universe is only 6000 years old, how can we see light from starts that are millions of light years away?'. Humphrey's cosmology definitively answers that question.
If indeed the universe as we know it has a center and an edge, and if we are close to the center than we are to the edge, then time is relativistic. For those planets and galaxies close to the edge (or event horizon) of the universe, time is much faster. For those things nearer the center of the universe, time would pass more slowly. Therefore, there is time dialation between us and the stars - this is how we can see light from stars that are millions of light years away while only 6000 years passes on earth.
Keep in mind, according to the creationist point of view, God spent several additional days beyond the creation of the 'rest of the universe' in creating life on earth (plants, then sea creatures, then land animals and finally man). Therefore, it stands to reason that the earth is very near or at the center of the universe, or even, perhaps, that the earth was somewhat uneffected by the established laws of the universe as God - who is not bound by time or space - continued his work here.
Scientifically, red shifts (as well as the concentric circles on that 3d map) are some other 'evidences' of this cosmology. I will post more on that later when I have more time.
See 'Evolutionist science journal gives exciting support to creationist cosmology!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Beercules, posted 05-12-2004 11:43 AM Beercules has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Eta_Carinae, posted 05-12-2004 6:36 PM Gup20 has not replied
 Message 24 by coffee_addict, posted 05-13-2004 1:20 AM Gup20 has not replied
 Message 47 by The Dread Dormammu, posted 12-08-2004 5:58 AM Gup20 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024