Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,425 Year: 3,682/9,624 Month: 553/974 Week: 166/276 Day: 6/34 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The problems of big bang theory. What are they?
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 5 of 389 (396890)
04-23-2007 8:12 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Neutralmind
04-22-2007 6:10 PM


The simplest problem
A total understanding of the early universe is difficult. It requires a theory that can fully understand the very small and highly energetic as well as the very large. Quantum physics gives us insight into the small, relativity the very large. Marrying the two is a work in progress.
The earliest conceptions of the big bang model fell apart hopelessly at the very small because of relativity's inadequacy at dealing with that level. We'd get lots of infinite values that made no sense.
More recent models have tried to come to an understanding of the very small end of the big bang and attempted to create a complete chronology - with some good successes, but the main problems now relate to the point at which quantum processes are overwhelmed by relativistic considerations.
A complex problem really - but one which can be relayed in simple terms.
Other issues with early big bang include the dark energy issue and the cosmological constant. Things like this had to be assumed. Newer models make predictions about these figures (predictions which are reflected in reality), but there are more esoteric properties (I'm no expert, but I believe the shape of Calabi-Yau space might be one of these) which have to be assumed...hypotheses abound to explain some of these properties - but I don't think there is any finality on the issue at this point.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Neutralmind, posted 04-22-2007 6:10 PM Neutralmind has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by cavediver, posted 04-24-2007 4:52 AM Modulous has not replied

Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 163 of 389 (457759)
02-25-2008 11:00 AM
Reply to: Message 159 by johnfolton
02-25-2008 2:13 AM


Re: Problem with the big bang
Perhaps the problem is the name big bang that suggests an explosion that the name should be changed if the universe multiplied due to say an expansion. If scientists no longer agree it started with a bang then change the name, etc...
Good idea. Hard to do in practice, because individuals rarely get the chance to dictate phrases - once they get out there, they're difficult to control. Having seen this, I think there is more caution in naming things these days - but it isn't perfect. As humans we like certain phrases, even if they aren't accurate. We have a penchant for metaphor that is always going to be problematic.
The big bang can be seen as a set of cosmological theories. Some of the later names are less contentious. How do you prefer "Inflationary Cosmology" for example?
Whats wrong with the universe started from a seed designed by God that this seed grew expanding faster than light and multiplying in space from say a seed the size of a pea, multiplying energy of say the vacuum energy of space (cashmier effect), to give shape to the universe like a mustard seed gives rise to an herb due cells multiplying thus in respect to the universe giving rise to galaxies multiplying.
What's right about it? Beats me, but a lot of thought has gone into philosophy and science and about how and when we can make confident statements about the way the universe works. One of the principle ideas that has stuck is parsimony - and God just adds replaces one unexplained/unexplainable problem with another.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 159 by johnfolton, posted 02-25-2008 2:13 AM johnfolton has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024