|
Author
|
Topic: Falsifying a young Universe. (re: Supernova 1987A)
|
SRO2 
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 34 of 948 (127548)
07-25-2004 8:33 PM
|
Reply to: Message 33 by NosyNed
07-25-2004 7:41 PM
|
|
Re: bump for HangDawg
You mean "supernovae". A stars life depends on factors of mass and fuel consumption before it goes supercritical, stars vary in longevity based on these factors (and maybe others). At any rate, it should be plural here.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 33 by NosyNed, posted 07-25-2004 7:41 PM | | NosyNed has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 35 by NosyNed, posted 07-25-2004 8:42 PM | | SRO2 has replied |
|
SRO2
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 36 of 948 (127553)
07-25-2004 8:51 PM
|
Reply to: Message 35 by NosyNed
07-25-2004 8:42 PM
|
|
Re: plural
My mistake. But it's important to point at that stars go supercritical at varying stages of life depending on a number of factors, so SN-1987A is only one sample.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 35 by NosyNed, posted 07-25-2004 8:42 PM | | NosyNed has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 37 by wj, posted 07-25-2004 9:51 PM | | SRO2 has replied |
|
SRO2
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 38 of 948 (127567)
07-25-2004 9:55 PM
|
Reply to: Message 37 by wj
07-25-2004 9:51 PM
|
|
Re: plural
The universe is a hell of lot older that 160,000 years. I don't believe in this one step at a time crap, the universe is about 13.5 billion years old.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 37 by wj, posted 07-25-2004 9:51 PM | | wj has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 39 by NosyNed, posted 07-26-2004 12:07 AM | | SRO2 has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2