Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,585 Year: 2,842/9,624 Month: 687/1,588 Week: 93/229 Day: 4/61 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Falsifying a young Universe. (re: Supernova 1987A)
SRO2 
Inactive Member


Message 34 of 948 (127548)
07-25-2004 8:33 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by NosyNed
07-25-2004 7:41 PM


Re: bump for HangDawg
You mean "supernovae". A stars life depends on factors of mass and fuel consumption before it goes supercritical, stars vary in longevity based on these factors (and maybe others). At any rate, it should be plural here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by NosyNed, posted 07-25-2004 7:41 PM NosyNed has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by NosyNed, posted 07-25-2004 8:42 PM SRO2 has replied

  
SRO2 
Inactive Member


Message 36 of 948 (127553)
07-25-2004 8:51 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by NosyNed
07-25-2004 8:42 PM


Re: plural
My mistake. But it's important to point at that stars go supercritical at varying stages of life depending on a number of factors, so SN-1987A is only one sample.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by NosyNed, posted 07-25-2004 8:42 PM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by wj, posted 07-25-2004 9:51 PM SRO2 has replied

  
SRO2 
Inactive Member


Message 38 of 948 (127567)
07-25-2004 9:55 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by wj
07-25-2004 9:51 PM


Re: plural
The universe is a hell of lot older that 160,000 years. I don't believe in this one step at a time crap, the universe is about 13.5 billion years old.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by wj, posted 07-25-2004 9:51 PM wj has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by NosyNed, posted 07-26-2004 12:07 AM SRO2 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024