Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,778 Year: 4,035/9,624 Month: 906/974 Week: 233/286 Day: 40/109 Hour: 2/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   In the begining...... nothing.... unless infinite past.
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 44 of 79 (223232)
07-11-2005 7:41 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by Oscar
07-11-2005 12:11 PM


nitpicking terminology
You can't have multiple UNI-verses, but I understand your idea.
Perhaps you should call the Superuniverse a Polyverse, or Multiverse, which is composed of many Verses, or maybe ?Monoverses?.
I prefer the idea that our universe is one of an infinite that have occured in a cyclical pattern of big bangs and big crunches over and over again.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Oscar, posted 07-11-2005 12:11 PM Oscar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by Phat, posted 03-27-2006 4:03 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 53 of 79 (298674)
03-27-2006 12:37 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by generaljoe
03-27-2006 12:47 AM


who says the universe hasnt been here continuously collapsing and reforming forever?
The cosmologists.
Read the replies to Message 6
where I asked the same question and it got answered.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by generaljoe, posted 03-27-2006 12:47 AM generaljoe has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by ramoss, posted 03-27-2006 12:42 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 57 of 79 (299303)
03-29-2006 10:51 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by Posit
03-29-2006 3:46 AM


Re: I would rather bank on a god than ignore the severe contridiction to my logic.
If properties such as timelessness or an infinite past are inconceivable when applied to the universe, how does ascribing them to a creator make them any more conceivable?
Because the creator has magic powers and the universe does not.
Any objections you have to a universe with an infinite past, or a universe appearing from nothing, can be applied just as well to a creator simply by substituting the word "creator" for the word "universe".
Unless you consider the creator a god with supernatural powers, then its different from the universe and could have properties that the universe could not.
In fact, given the past fifty years, it's a safe bet that within most of our lifetimes something very counerintuitive will be discovered about how the universe works.
Yep, and they're fun to read about too.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by Posit, posted 03-29-2006 3:46 AM Posit has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by sidelined, posted 03-29-2006 12:29 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 60 by Posit, posted 03-29-2006 12:37 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 61 of 79 (299349)
03-29-2006 12:41 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by sidelined
03-29-2006 12:29 PM


Re: I would rather bank on a god than ignore the severe contridiction to my logic.
But if the qualities of God are supernatural then how can communication occur with the natural since this implies a natural means of alerting our physical senses?
Yeah, what Jar said. A square is a rectangle but a rectangle isn't always a square.
This message has been edited by Catholic Scientist, 03-29-2006 11:41 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by sidelined, posted 03-29-2006 12:29 PM sidelined has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 63 of 79 (299377)
03-29-2006 2:36 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by sidelined
03-29-2006 2:22 PM


Re: Supersets and subsets
This does not mean that the supernatural does not exist just that it cannot affect the natural without altering its nature.
would you please clarify the ambiguity of what "its" is refering too.
The supernatural cannot affect the natural without altering the supernatural's nature?
or the supernatural cannot affect the natural without altering the natural's nature?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by sidelined, posted 03-29-2006 2:22 PM sidelined has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024