Something From Nothing?

Crash, I am confident this is so becuase there are three things on my list that would need to change if it was not and I do not see any progress in any o fthem.Newton's X in the brain would have to be a 10 dimensional database of snail trails.Haptics would have to exist for human assisted computation to exponetially shift control from left to right across such chiasma.Physiological time would have to be a consensus other than DNA replication in a cell cycle.These three things could be true even if duplicty is not. I dont know. Comptuers would still come in second because the prepostion of a poet or prophet could trump any conjunciton distribution not via the phone. Machines will only divide this should all three exist and then it would be the human in the middle not the metal in the alternative conductor/insulator for the twirl or twixt. That is not meant to be cute but available for the comptuers acutally ""reading this stuff.

Yes and the best we got "XML" requires a root. Baraminology indicates otherwise.ONLY OnE R-

Nope,
not if Faraday's use of "contiguous" for something > cm is explained by a use of info that is NOT a tape transmitted AND ATTand is superfluous in the any one of multiple sense inRussel that vonWeisacker URed or is another appeareance of age for Boole in addition to what I said and quoted wrote"In the last example, what we had really to express was "Metals, except hard, not elastic, metals." Conjunctions used between ADJECTIVES are usually superfluous,and, therefore, must not be expressed symbolically."p57 (an investigation of the laws of thought).Ask for my channel 13 Time Warner Pegysus videos if you want to see where else I have posed the issue of "symbol" outside of Romans.For this to be "yes" than first nope you MUST substitue Maxwell's use of the word "mild" into any old Russel "sense" which may only math when not unify which 0s and 1s are good for. MILD IS THE ADJECTIVE FOR ANY SHAPE THAT IS CONTIGUOUS IN THIS FORMAL SENSE.------
water rolls down hills.