Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 0/46 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A question concerning Evolution
Abshalom
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 38 (78938)
01-16-2004 7:01 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Rand Al'Thor
01-16-2004 6:41 PM


Think About It
When you really stop and think about it, is there all that much difference between the degree of bizarreness, or maybe it's the degree to which you would have to stretch your imagination, required for a simple human to envision and then totally accept one the following [or something else equally as bizarre]:
1) There is a single creator-entity who is able to single-handedly manufacture each and every minute detail of every single object in the entire universe; and then actually has the time and the inclination to reveal himself and even carry on conversations with a select few individuals from one selected species on a sinle planet from among the billions of galaxies.
2) There is a vast pantheon of creator gods and subordinate worker/influence gods who together have manufactured each and every single object in the entire universe, and then have continuously occupied, influenced, abandoned, defiled, and otherwise fiddled with both the animate and inanimate entities occupying the universe.
3) Every single thing in this vast, infinite universe was contained within an infinitely small point which exploded into being, rapidly expanded, cooled, and evolved into the entirety of all things; and which even after cooling to a point that life could evolve, now is even more rapidly expanding rather than contracting.
4) Everything we see is an illusionary veil which will be lifted when we transcend into the reality of Ohm.
The last of the four seems simplest to accept. Peace.
[This message has been edited by Abshalom, 01-16-2004]
[This message has been edited by Abshalom, 01-16-2004]
[This message has been edited by Abshalom, 01-16-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Rand Al'Thor, posted 01-16-2004 6:41 PM Rand Al'Thor has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by NosyNed, posted 01-16-2004 7:13 PM Abshalom has not replied

  
Abshalom
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 38 (78994)
01-17-2004 1:07 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by NosyNed
01-17-2004 12:50 AM


Time Out
Actually this is not a reply, rebuttal, or argument.
Just a question.
Does "time" require motion?
If there is no motion, is there no time?
Prior to the Bang, was there motion in the proto-universe?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by NosyNed, posted 01-17-2004 12:50 AM NosyNed has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by NosyNed, posted 01-17-2004 1:27 AM Abshalom has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024