Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,833 Year: 4,090/9,624 Month: 961/974 Week: 288/286 Day: 9/40 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Misconceptions in Relativity
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9197
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.2


Message 27 of 141 (508938)
05-17-2009 11:03 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by cavediver
05-17-2009 9:30 AM


Carmeli seems to have been a darling of the YEC's
It has profound results for cosmology in general and in particular Young Earth Creation cosmology. So far this theory fits all experimental findings.
From Creationwiki
Kind of makes you question the science. You think he published any of this in peer reviewed journals?

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by cavediver, posted 05-17-2009 9:30 AM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by cavediver, posted 05-17-2009 11:09 AM Theodoric has not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9197
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.2


Message 29 of 141 (508940)
05-17-2009 11:11 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by cavediver
05-17-2009 9:30 AM


From the link you referred to. Here.
I think this is the key paragraph.
Hartnett makes numerous erroneous statements on properties of PSD, suggesting he is relying on his 'intuition' on how the PSD works instead of actually testing the claim. Most researchers, myself included, must demonstrate that our test protocols work for datasets of known content before making such grandiose claims when applying the test to datasets of unknown content. In the abstract for Paper I, Hartnett states that his results "indicate that this is a real effect and not some observational artifact." Yet he has apparently conducted no tests to determine which characteristics of his results are analysis artifacts.
Typical creationist, using "intuition" instead of actually testing. Sure doesnt sound like the scientific method does it.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by cavediver, posted 05-17-2009 9:30 AM cavediver has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024