infinite space

THANKS!!

Which in my opinion is infinite.All I am trying to say is that there is a possibility for infinite space within everything.

Maybe there's an infinite amount of it, but each string is only a finite amount of spacetime.

Dan had pointed it out earlier one puts a string"QS" Materialanother string"/QS" with the 'square bace character in the place of where I put the """ so for intstance below I could have responded to Crash withMatchette said on two pages in his Outline , and Matchette also said how AND WHY This is not imagination and speculation but a requirement in the renewed discussion of absolute space and time brought up by Craw when attempting to take into effect the notion of levels of organzation as individuals with specific begninings and endings in empirical space. The other guys/gals here have yet to indicate that I am presenting a consistent view. It is not out of the blue but simply read as is. Crashfrog is simply using the same "prejudice" my two physicist brothers use when discussing change of form with me but I must say BOTH as the interpretation works compared to the Frog in the case that in fact one believes in a GOD and the other is asking.All I need supply is little Mendelian grammetology. All the naysayers can say is that I'vs got the wrong grounded substrate but with Wolfran's new kind of science even this objection is not the lack of understading it may still appear to be. I am still a "master" of this unit or domain.

I agree, each string may be a finite amount of spacetime, but I believe that there are an infinite amount of cosmic string of infinitely varying size weaving a web of infinity.

Well, if you want to substitute mystical mumbo-jumbo for rational inquiry about the universe, that's your perogative. I don't see any difference between that and creationism, personally.

Infinite space is not mystical mumbo-jumbo.It's something you realize exists after years and years of asking yourself, HOW?I know to you that probably sounds like a bunch of nonsence. But remember everyone has their own algorithoms to reach a desired conclusion.P.S. this will be my last post for a bit because I have to step awat from my computer.
(not that you care)
I look forward to future discussions.

Then I trust you'll be able to support it with evidence, instead of metaphors like "weaving a web of infinity." What does that even mean?

Cyclic models are hard to rule out, however. Without a good way to know anything about quantum gravity, there is a lot of speculation around the really doesn't amount to much. For example, the cosmological constant that is now causing the universe to accelerate could reverse to have positive pressure and cause space to contract.As I said, it's all speculation but we'll need to know something about quantum gravity to describe the earliest moments of the universe in the first place.

What does infinite space explain that finite space cannot? Either finite or infinite space brings up the issue of a beginning.

Our universe may have a beginning but infinite space by definition, has NO beginning. Nor an end.

It refers to the possibility of an infinite web of cosmic strings.

Ya know, it is possible to string words together and sound like you are saying something without having any actual content at all.

I'm sorry you can't understand.

I meant a beginning of time. An infinite universe still gets stuck with that problem. As well, a finite universe also has no edges or ends.