Randman writes:
Personally, I don't think you have it in you to be able to address the topic straighforwardly, but I am willing to give you a chance...just this once.
Gosh, Rand, that'd be swell!
What would you like to debate? Petroglyphs of Fred Flintsone's pet dinosaur, Dino? The South American trade in tourist stones painted with thunder lizards plucked from 1950s illustrated popular science? Quantum hocus-pocus that proves the past tail can wave the present dog?
On second thought, no thanks. I've handed you your head a dozen times in real debate, before you were thrown into this geek cage for your inability to recognize evidence and logic. Like Monty Python's Black Knight, you bleed to death without ever feeling any pain.
Why beat a dead ass?
Only the breath-taking hypocrisy--remarkable even for the presenter of a "Collector's Curve" empty of data points as evidence of declining fossil finds (search for that one, kids, it's a blast)--of requesting Dr. Adequate's removal while simultaneously misrepresenting his comments moved me to post. You used to be more subtle.
Take a tip from your Uncle Omni: you have nothing but entertainment value here. Posture, twist, misrepresent, dodge, pretend, build monuments to cultish web sites--but don't bounce your foils.
It makes you look like a weenie.
Drinking when we are not thirsty and making love at any time, madam, is all that distinguishes us from the other animals.
-Pierre De Beaumarchais (1732-1799)
Save lives! Click here!Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!---------------------------------------