Randman writes:
6. The idea that natural selection is an agent for macroevolution, completely unsubstantiated as the forces of natural selection appear to limit genetic diversity, not increase it.
7. The idea that microevolution is an example of macroevolution writ small. Once again, it's a false idea because the forces of microevolution tend to limit genetic diversity, not increase it.\
8. Claiming the fossil record shows evolutionary transitions when in reality, it shows the opposite.
I could go on and on, but perhaps some other critics of evolution would like to add to the list......after all, we want to make sure people are not conned.
Hi Randman. Nice to talk to you again. I do miss your imput in the other forums. I especially appreciate the points you have made in this thread and have cited you in POM as speaking for many of us.
1. Regarding #6, would sexual harmony in alleged macroevolution be a problem evolutionists would have in species changes.
2. What is your thinking on abiogenisis relative to the need for reproduction including all the complexities which the sex/reproductive factor would present for it to continue once generated for survival in the earliest stage of alleged abiogenisis. Perhaps you might open a thread here on that if you think it worth discussing as I've wondered about it for a long time. I brought it up in my recent Is It Science thread as one of the things evolutionists appear to be sweeping under the rug but see nobody responded to my remark there. I'm not sure whether it would apply to this thread or not.
BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW ---- Jesus said, "When these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads, for your redemption draws near." Luke 21:28