PurpleYouko writes:
I would imagine that if God does exist then he should be extremely relevent.
Science hasn't run into any problems that it needs a god to solve.
PurpleYouko writes:
Or do you think maybe the fact of missing evidence for his existence should be construed as positive evidence for his lack of existence.
It's evidence for lack of relevance, as the value of something that does nothing perceptible is the same as something that does nothing, which is the same as the absence of a thing. (as absences don't "do" at all)
So, the question of existence doesn't need to be tackled, as it doesn't matter what the answer is.
™ Version 4.2
