Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,353 Year: 3,610/9,624 Month: 481/974 Week: 94/276 Day: 22/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is talkorigins.org a propoganda site?
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 189 of 301 (288214)
02-18-2006 7:44 PM
Reply to: Message 188 by randman
02-18-2006 6:52 PM


Could you make the post easier to follow please?
You got me interested in this topic but I can't follow this post. Could you clean up the quotes so I can tell who is saying what? And the spacing or paragraphing is confusing too.
And is this what you want to show: That Talkorigins gives conflicting definitions of evolution? If that doesn't quite say it, could you give a sharper statement of what you are trying to demonstrate?
Thanks,
Faith
This message has been edited by Faith, 02-18-2006 07:50 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 188 by randman, posted 02-18-2006 6:52 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 196 by randman, posted 02-18-2006 10:29 PM Faith has replied
 Message 197 by randman, posted 02-18-2006 10:38 PM Faith has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 191 of 301 (288224)
02-18-2006 8:23 PM
Reply to: Message 190 by nwr
02-18-2006 8:19 PM


Maybe not propaganda
I wonder if there are contradictions that should be brought to light, quite apart from whether there is any propaganda going on. In fact that accusation may obscure the point that there could be important contradictions to think about. I think we need to assume that the evolutionists believe their stuff and aren't out to deceive anyone, at least not intentionally.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by nwr, posted 02-18-2006 8:19 PM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 192 by nwr, posted 02-18-2006 8:57 PM Faith has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 194 of 301 (288248)
02-18-2006 9:39 PM
Reply to: Message 193 by robinrohan
02-18-2006 9:02 PM


Re: here is some of what I posted
I THINK Randman was quoting Talkorigins at that point, rather than saying that himself, but that's the problem with his post -- sorting out who is saying what.
And I THINK he's trying to make a point about their contradicting themselves, but I have been unable to follow the post. So I hope he will show up and make it crystal clear.
This message has been edited by Faith, 02-18-2006 09:41 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 193 by robinrohan, posted 02-18-2006 9:02 PM robinrohan has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 195 of 301 (288251)
02-18-2006 9:48 PM
Reply to: Message 192 by nwr
02-18-2006 8:57 PM


Re: Maybe not propaganda
I happen to think that they would be better advised to use more caution about what they call a fact. Or, to put it differently, I can see why randman objects to the way that they discuss some of this. However, I think randman is wrong in depicting it as being done with the intention to deceive.
Could be a very useful discussion then, if we can steer away from that accusation. I haven't had the patience to read through much of the material at Talkorigins myself, but it would be interesting to see a good analysis of their arguments.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 192 by nwr, posted 02-18-2006 8:57 PM nwr has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 203 of 301 (288268)
02-18-2006 11:23 PM
Reply to: Message 196 by randman
02-18-2006 10:29 PM


Re: Could you make the post easier to follow please?
Faith, I was just showing that I had already been a great deal of time quoting TO to illustrate their logical fallacy. Sorry it is confusing.
Yes, but I haven't read through the whole thread and since you did go to that trouble I would like to be able to read the post, but it's too garbled to read clearly. All you need do is edit the quotes so it's possible to tell who is saying what, and put some spaces between paragraphs and lines. That would help a lot.
This message has been edited by Faith, 02-18-2006 11:24 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 196 by randman, posted 02-18-2006 10:29 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 205 by randman, posted 02-18-2006 11:40 PM Faith has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 204 of 301 (288269)
02-18-2006 11:27 PM
Reply to: Message 200 by NosyNed
02-18-2006 10:58 PM


Request Admin Attention please
Jar, it is beginning to seem that randman is getting to you a bit. He is a laughable joke. There is nothing to get bothered about. We remember that he is a member of a small, cult-like so-called Christian group not a representative of the whole.
This is such standard NosyNed stuff I hardly take it seriously any more, but it does run the neighborhood down as it is a violation of the Forum Guidelines, so it might be worth a look.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 200 by NosyNed, posted 02-18-2006 10:58 PM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 206 by randman, posted 02-18-2006 11:42 PM Faith has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024