Is creationism science?

And: You do? I mean, you really understand all the evidence? Excellent! I am not a biologist, although I've been working in a closely-related field for the last dozen years or so. I can't claim to have seen even one tiny fraction of the evidence in support of evolutionary theory. However, I can say that all the myriad of observations I've personally made and all the evidence that I've personally seen, touched, smelled and occasionally been bitten by, is entirely consistent with evolution. Not one single anomaly in all those years with my nose in the dirt. Although this is probably not the appropriate thread, I would be extremely grateful if you or someone would educate me as to what evidence or observations implicitly or explicitly calls into question the ToE. I've been known to be wrong in the past, after all.

Actually, you misinterpreted what I said. I didn't say I hadn't seen evidence in support of evolution. In fact, I am literally surrounded by evidence, observations, phenomena, interactions, etc on a daily basis that simply cannot be explained by everything being poofed into existence ex nihilo in 4004 BC. I am often literally knee deep in evidence in support of evolutionary theory. I have even been stung by organisms whose behavior can only be explained by evolution. BUT, and this is a very important "but" in this context, all that myriad of evidence is yet only one, teeny, tiny fraction of the available evidence in support of the theory. One single thread in the vast tapestry of mutually supporting threads that together make up the ToE. There are gobs, mountains of evidence available - all consistent. It would, IMO, take several lifetimes to encompass it all. So when I said I personally only really understood a "tiny fraction" of the available evidence (in response to your claim that you understood all the evidence), it wasn't because the evidence wasn't there beyond my ken, it was because I personally can only vouch for one small piece. So my request to you was to enlighten me on all the rest you claim to know. Especially if that huge amount I don't know would somehow validate creationism.Understand my position better, now?