Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,460 Year: 3,717/9,624 Month: 588/974 Week: 201/276 Day: 41/34 Hour: 4/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A speculation that Time is naturally explained
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 3 of 6 (374641)
01-05-2007 3:25 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by mike the wiz
01-04-2007 5:52 PM


It seems logical to me that if distance can't be divided into an infinite number of sections then neither should time. If the smallest possible distance is a planck length then it makes sense that the smallest moment of time, (a now), would be one planck time.
I think you will find Julian Barbour's work interesting. Make sure that you click on the interview at the bottom of the page.
Julian Barbour
Here is his own web site
Julian Barbour
Edited by GDR, : To add 2nd link

Everybody is entitled to my opinion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by mike the wiz, posted 01-04-2007 5:52 PM mike the wiz has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024