Evidence of is evidence that assigns a plausibility near one to an event. Evidence for is evidence that raises the plausibility a measurable degree, but could leave it moderately low.
Oh, good lord. More of the "evidence but not proof" malarkey.
When you actually have evidence
of something, I'll pay attention. But there's no more reason to pay attention to what you have then there is to pay attention to the guy who has evidence
for but not
of the government plot to put a chip in his head.