Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,488 Year: 3,745/9,624 Month: 616/974 Week: 229/276 Day: 5/64 Hour: 3/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Ground Rules
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 306 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 61 of 68 (514361)
07-06-2009 9:13 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by InGodITrust
07-01-2009 3:47 AM


Bluescat, you wrote that it is absurd for me to think that science=atheism. And for the most part it would be absurd. But in some areas of science it would not be such a stretch. How about the origin of life? Isn't that an area with a lot of scientist trying to find how life occurred "naturally", through chemical reactions, rather than being created by a god?
And when scientists found natural causes for rainbows, rather than God making them by magic, was that atheism?
When they maintain, in the face of some people's religious beliefs, that the world is round, is that atheism?
If, tomorrow, someone started a religious sect that said that there was no gravity and God sends angels to make things fall, would a belief in the theory of gravity suddenly become atheistic?
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by InGodITrust, posted 07-01-2009 3:47 AM InGodITrust has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by Coyote, posted 07-06-2009 10:34 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 306 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 62 of 68 (514362)
07-06-2009 9:27 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by InGodITrust
06-28-2009 2:50 PM


I went to Natural Bridges National Monument on vacation one year, and watched a film about the formations at the visitors center. The film stated matter-of-factly how old the formations were and how they were produced. There was a sign posted at an overlook with similar info. It is a nice visitors center an the park service has done a good job, but the information in the film and on the sign conflicts with the Bible.
Now the 1st Amendment is interpreted to bar religion being preached by the government in schools and public buildings---and rightly so I guess. But why doesn't it prevent atheism from being preached? Why is atheism the official government position?
The First Amendment does prevent atheism from being preached. That's one of the many reasons why the government doesn't put signs up saying: "There is no God".
But, as I intimated in my previous post, the fact that a statement conflicts with some person's religious beliefs doesn't make it atheism. This is why, despite the beliefs of devout flat-Earthers, public school teachers are still allowed to teach that the Earth isn't flat, and the USGS are still allowed to produce maps based on a round Earth. That's not a religious point of view, it's a scientific point of view.
It may conflict with some people's religions, but that's their problem: it shouldn't have to be a problem for scientists.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by InGodITrust, posted 06-28-2009 2:50 PM InGodITrust has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024