Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why should religion get a free pass?
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2320 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 67 of 112 (485830)
10-12-2008 4:43 AM
Reply to: Message 65 by johnfolton
10-11-2008 9:54 PM


Re: Generation of Scientists Turning Againist Evolution
johnfolton writes:
I find it so true that evolution science was stolen from the bible then repackaged.
Evolution was taken from the bible? The bible says all creatures were created in one go by god, evolution says they all develloped from a common ancestor.
God the author of the bible said genes can be purged from a gene pool after 10 generations bible micro-evolution science principles about genetic's(evolutionists stole micro-evolution science from the bible repackaged it as a lie called macro-evolution)
First off, prove GOD wrote the bible and not men, second, it does NOT speak about genetics AT ALL.
The bible says the earth and the universe had a beginning (the evolutionists don't deny the universe had a beginning so they said they created the big bang)
Evolutionsists didn't create the big bang, that would be physicists.
the bible declaring that there were fossil in the earth catastrophically formed by a world flood by the earth( the fossils being formed suddenly that were there just as the bible proclaimed so the evolutionists had to move the goal posts to explain this to large periods of time. So the pseudo science of paleontology had to sell this garbage to the guillable because the fossil record proved the earth but was an young earth)
The bible says NOTHING about fossils. Furthermore, they could not have formed in the flood, since they'd be sorted rather differently then they are now.
that the earth is young (creationists are dating all fossils thousands of years old) so the evolutionists say they don't date by C14 cause the fossils are old, etc...
Of course you can't date fossils with carbon 14 dating, THERE'S NO CARBON IN THEM.
The bible says no transistional fossils (creationists say if transistional occured they are not in the fossil record) so the evolutionists come up with claudistic similarities but that does not get around the missing fossils that are just not there). The evolutionists call it the common ancestor but without batting an eye about the lack of transistionals they say the common ancestor while the creationists say the fossil evidence proves it an young earth.
ALL fossils are transitional. Furthermore, fossilisation is a very rare process, of course not all lifefroms that ever existed get fossilized. About the common ancestor, the strongest evidence for this is not the fossil record, but genetics.
I suspect the evolutionists know its an young earth but given they stole all their great ideas and spun truth into a lie they can not admit they twisted all their scientific principles from the bible.
"Evolutionists" did NOT take ANYTHINGS from the bible. further, the bible is BY NO MEANS a scientific work in ANY respect.
To cover their backsides they ridicule the bible as not being a scientific source of information when micro-evolution principles that that the evolutionist twisted and breeders use the untwisted micro-evolution principles that come from the bible to purge unwanted genes from a gene pool. Lets teach creationism not lies twisted from the truth in the bible, etc...
No evolutionary principles come from the bible. I agree, we shouldn't teach lies....like creationism.
P.S. The evolutionists know there is not any transistional fossils that support their theory the scientific principles they stole from the bible there twisting cause the transisitional fossils just are not there. A little child waiting for mommy dog to have puppies expects puppies cause thats how it works. If you want to teach people to identify trees go to the library. You have the same kinds of creatures going back thousands of years yet evolutionists would say evolution is based on sound scientific principles.
Evoultions IS based on sound scientific principles, in spite of your unfounded claims that it is not.
The truth is that they twisted the scientific principles they stolen from the bible so micro changes supports macro changes when you just don't have evidence of transistional characteristics creating a new kind. People use characteristics to identify tree's, bird, lizards, fish, from books its quite amazing how kinds characteristics are not changing allowing people to identify all kinds of creatures that are not changin into a different kind of creature. Mosquitoes billions of mutations yet still a Mosquitoes, etc...
How many times are you going to repeat these lies? Seriously stop it, it's not making you look good.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by johnfolton, posted 10-11-2008 9:54 PM johnfolton has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2320 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


(3)
Message 95 of 112 (648975)
01-19-2012 3:36 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by NoNukes
01-19-2012 12:50 PM


Re: What would constitute not getting a free pass?
NoNukes writes:
Do we go out of our way to ridicule our co-workers who believe in ghosts or von Daniken conspiracy theories, or do we largely just leave them alone as long as they don't leave their work for us to do?
Yes, we (or atleast I) do. I have two colleagues who think Derek Ogilvie is the shiznits, and I ride them everytime they bring it up. This of course makes me the asshole (according to them). However, my other two colleagues agree with me, yet don't speak up when they bring that shit up because "well, that's just what they believe". Well yeah, "but if I were to proclaim my belief in the flying spaghetti monster you wouldn't allow me to show up to work in my pirate regalia, now would you, you tosser!" "Now you're just being silly". "Really, what's the difference between one irrational belief and the other?" ".....". "exactly".
Anyway..... That's enough ranting for now. Back to being amicable little Huntard.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by NoNukes, posted 01-19-2012 12:50 PM NoNukes has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024