Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,822 Year: 4,079/9,624 Month: 950/974 Week: 277/286 Day: 38/46 Hour: 3/7


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

Haeckeling, trying to wrap it up....

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Haeckeling, trying to wrap it up....
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 18 of 93 (268487)
12-12-2005 10:16 PM 		Reply to: Message 17 by randman
12-12-2005 10:14 PM

Re: Credible evidence?
It is beginning to appear that Richardson may have been wrong or overstating the case.
​
There doesn't seem to have been much made available to support what he says. I took it at face value at first but there doesn't seem to be much to support it.
​
ABE
​
It seems to me that the "significant influence" is clearly wrong. I'd have to see that spelled out.
​
This message has been edited by NosyNed, 12-12-2005 10:18 PM
This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by randman, posted 12-12-2005 10:14 PM randman has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by jar, posted 12-12-2005 10:27 PM NosyNed has not replied
 Message 21 by randman, posted 12-12-2005 10:28 PM NosyNed has not replied
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 62 of 93 (268597)
12-13-2005 12:35 AM

An interesting comment from Richardson.
quote:
Raff (1992) has pointed out that developmental biologists tend to emphasize the similarities among species whereas evolutionary biologists emphasize the differences. The result is a long history of disagreement over the extent to which embryonic develoment is conserved during evolution.
( bolds mine)
​
"Evolutionists" commiting fraud Rand? It is not clear your own reference supports you.
​
What it is saying is that a number of biologists may not have been careful enough. There is no hint that they didn't believe what they were publishing.
​
Do you have any other support for your views Randman?
Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by randman, posted 12-13-2005 12:53 AM NosyNed has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024