Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,876 Year: 4,133/9,624 Month: 1,004/974 Week: 331/286 Day: 52/40 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Misconceptions of E=MC^2
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 125 of 243 (452821)
01-31-2008 11:39 AM
Reply to: Message 111 by pelican
01-30-2008 8:05 PM


Re: E=MC2 experiments explained in simplest forms
I need a simplified version which I believe you are perfectly capable of doing but don't try. I have no evidence to prove this. It is purely my observation.
You have been given enormously simple versions and explanations. If you doubt that ask for the real thing from cavediver. Then you will see the difference.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by pelican, posted 01-30-2008 8:05 PM pelican has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 190 of 243 (453688)
02-03-2008 5:49 PM
Reply to: Message 188 by Modulous
02-03-2008 5:28 PM


Not predict?
Can any of the permutations of e=mc^2 be 'manipulated' in reality to reproduce a predicted outcome? ?
No, they just represent the way mass and energy are related. It is itself a prediction of Einstein's theory of relativity. The prediction is that mass and energy will be related in the fashion described by the equation.
I don't understand your answer.
e can be predicted by one permutation, m by another so why not?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 188 by Modulous, posted 02-03-2008 5:28 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 191 by Modulous, posted 02-03-2008 5:55 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024