Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Misconceptions of E=MC^2
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3663 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 207 of 243 (453775)
02-04-2008 3:51 AM
Reply to: Message 204 by pelican
02-04-2008 12:11 AM


Re: don't insult me
you are a pompous lame brained idiot
Only from you, Heinrik, can I take this a complement and I do so with delight
Let's just have it again:
Heinrik in his opening lines writes:
I have no misconceptions of E=MC2. I do not dispute it's authenticity. What I do dispute is others conceptions of what it actually means.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 204 by pelican, posted 02-04-2008 12:11 AM pelican has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 210 by pelican, posted 02-04-2008 4:18 AM cavediver has not replied

  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3663 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 239 of 243 (455067)
02-10-2008 5:17 AM
Reply to: Message 236 by johnfolton
02-09-2008 8:47 PM


Re: Nothing to trust - stop feeding the troll.
Bell's theorem seemed to seal the fate of those that had local realist hopes for QM.
Yes, it did. Which is why we are happy to abandon 'realism', retaining locality. When we do this, combining Special Relativity with Quantum Mechanics, we obtain Quantum Field Theory - one of the two most successful theories ever formulated (the other being General Relativity.)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 236 by johnfolton, posted 02-09-2008 8:47 PM johnfolton has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024