Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,423 Year: 3,680/9,624 Month: 551/974 Week: 164/276 Day: 4/34 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What are M-Theory and String theory etc. and are they valid scientific theories?
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5542 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006


Message 8 of 48 (393924)
04-08-2007 1:04 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Rob
04-08-2007 11:03 AM


Re: Not valid theories...
In order to rescue the 'chance hypothesis' and escape the moral implications of an orderly creator, 'scientists' (prophets) and their 'followers' (sheep), have offered a metaphysical theology of their own.
This thread is not about morality. It is OFF TOPIC here. but there are are threads currenly open where it would on topic. Why don`t you post there instad???
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Fix quote box.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Rob, posted 04-08-2007 11:03 AM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Rob, posted 04-08-2007 1:22 PM fallacycop has not replied
 Message 10 by Chiroptera, posted 04-08-2007 1:27 PM fallacycop has not replied

  
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5542 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006


Message 20 of 48 (394394)
04-11-2007 12:44 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Rob
04-09-2007 6:12 PM


Re: Not valid theories...
The reasons for the moral implications are quite obvious as any moral scene that is legitimate for our universe is ultimately undone by the overlying reality of randomness of the whole.
I actually find it interesting that the 'theory of eveything' is being sought, and find the quantum realm more of a substantiation of my own beliefs rather than a challenge. I also believe that the true 'Theory of Everything' is already perfectly encapsulated in the concept of the 'Trinity'.
Where are the admins?
how can someone post something like that in a science forum about a subject he obviously knows nothing about and doesn`t want to learn either, without getting at least a warning?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Rob, posted 04-09-2007 6:12 PM Rob has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Taz, posted 04-11-2007 1:56 AM fallacycop has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024