IF??? so-called scientific creationism for any reason that we/you/me bother to post is (otherwise this post would simply be deleted), given that you asked this question I can say that insofar as creation science or scientific creationsm (and I do not know which nor is the distinction so clear in my mind as I type this today) has influenced my scientific attitude that was picked up in popular works and schooling Prior to have heard of or choose to read any of this work subsequently I think (and I will not answer the question with another one)that having "learnt" of Maxwell's pedagogic hope for future (that means me) students to have as gravity, entropy, I do. I think that makes scientific creationism (creating an interest and use for this entropy) "scientific". You may disagree that influencing a student is not making something "scientific" and in some worked out philosphy I guess that could be socially maintained but I am speaking as a biologist who NEeds a handle on "quantitive evolutionary theory" and this "science" knowledge is helpful prior to turning the same work that has made it a trick these days to speak on creation and evolution as not sitting on the fence thought ___________.
[This message has been edited by Brad McFall, 02-06-2002]
™ Version 4.2
