Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,875 Year: 4,132/9,624 Month: 1,003/974 Week: 330/286 Day: 51/40 Hour: 2/3


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

Can science support creationism?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Can science support creationism?
tsig
Member (Idle past 2937 days)
Posts: 738
From: USA
Joined: 04-09-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 57 of 95 (156763)
11-06-2004 6:00 PM 		Reply to: Message 19 by Buzsaw
11-03-2004 9:54 PM

Re: Explanation response.
Full circle back to my point. Your "other means" appear to be weaker than intelligent design for the complexity such as that observed in the human brain.
​
Buz,the content of your posts argue against the comlexity of the human mind.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Buzsaw, posted 11-03-2004 9:54 PM Buzsaw has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by AdminNosy, posted 11-06-2004 6:04 PM tsig has replied
 Message 59 by AdminJar, posted 11-06-2004 6:04 PM tsig has replied
 Message 61 by Buzsaw, posted 11-06-2004 6:26 PM tsig has not replied
  
tsig
Member (Idle past 2937 days)
Posts: 738
From: USA
Joined: 04-09-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 62 of 95 (156803)
11-06-2004 6:49 PM 		Reply to: Message 35 by Buzsaw
11-04-2004 10:33 PM

Re: Support??
I didn't say there was never decrease in entropy now, did I? On the other hand, how much order and decrease of entropy, moving contrary to the tendency of the scientific law, can one observe on one itty bitty planet and still say 2ltd is still operative??
​
When you die your complex brain will return to a much less complex state, so the ultimate operation of the 2ltd will be vindicated. We only get a brief time under the sun, then we return from where we have come.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Buzsaw, posted 11-04-2004 10:33 PM Buzsaw has not replied
  
tsig
Member (Idle past 2937 days)
Posts: 738
From: USA
Joined: 04-09-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 63 of 95 (156806)
11-06-2004 6:57 PM 		Reply to: Message 59 by AdminJar
11-06-2004 6:04 PM

Re: Not needed.
Does that post advance the discussion in any way? If not, it should be dropped.
Read buz's reply.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by AdminJar, posted 11-06-2004 6:04 PM AdminJar has not replied
  
tsig
Member (Idle past 2937 days)
Posts: 738
From: USA
Joined: 04-09-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 64 of 95 (156816)
11-06-2004 7:10 PM 		Reply to: Message 58 by AdminNosy
11-06-2004 6:04 PM

Re: Uncalled for
Sure you understood what I meant. This seems like an overreaction. I've seen people call others ignorant with no moderator input.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by AdminNosy, posted 11-06-2004 6:04 PM AdminNosy has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by AdminNosy, posted 11-06-2004 8:04 PM tsig has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024